The Use of Social Networking Platform Twitter by Russian and British Politicians: Comparative Analysis

L. Minaeva
{"title":"The Use of Social Networking Platform Twitter by Russian and British Politicians: Comparative Analysis","authors":"L. Minaeva","doi":"10.1109/ComSDS49898.2020.9101285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent transformation of media into the computer-controlled infrastructure has fundamentally affected all spheres of society and social life. The paper focuses on the growing adoption of social networking sites by politicians in an attempt to foster better communication with the public. To examine the use of social networking platforms in political communication the comparative analysis of Twitter accounts of three Russian and three British politicians was carried out against the theoretical background of mediatization of politics. The concept of “mediatization” presupposes a social change process in which media have become increasingly influential and deeply integrated into different spheres of society. Politics is not an exception. At present social networking platforms are transforming people’s engagement with politics and make politicians more open to the public. In the course of research both quantitative and qualitative methods were used. The results address three areas: format and frequency of social networking use by politicians for sharing information with the public, perceived effectiveness of social networking tools for communication of politicians with the public, and the degree of interaction of politicians with the public. The results show that politicians rely on responsiveness, interactivity and engagement to involve users into political process. The results also indicate that Russian politicians use fewer multimedia tools than British ones and are more reserved in expressing their ideas. British users are more active than Russian ones and are always ready to take part in political discussions. This can be accounted for by, at least, two factors. One of them is a long tradition of participatory democracy in Great Britain which presupposes open discussions of political issues aimed at achieving rationally motivated consensus. The other –a high level of online activity of British politicians. Findings can help PR-practitioners to improve the use of social networking sites by Russian politicians to increase the impact of political communication on the public.","PeriodicalId":337761,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ComSDS49898.2020.9101285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent transformation of media into the computer-controlled infrastructure has fundamentally affected all spheres of society and social life. The paper focuses on the growing adoption of social networking sites by politicians in an attempt to foster better communication with the public. To examine the use of social networking platforms in political communication the comparative analysis of Twitter accounts of three Russian and three British politicians was carried out against the theoretical background of mediatization of politics. The concept of “mediatization” presupposes a social change process in which media have become increasingly influential and deeply integrated into different spheres of society. Politics is not an exception. At present social networking platforms are transforming people’s engagement with politics and make politicians more open to the public. In the course of research both quantitative and qualitative methods were used. The results address three areas: format and frequency of social networking use by politicians for sharing information with the public, perceived effectiveness of social networking tools for communication of politicians with the public, and the degree of interaction of politicians with the public. The results show that politicians rely on responsiveness, interactivity and engagement to involve users into political process. The results also indicate that Russian politicians use fewer multimedia tools than British ones and are more reserved in expressing their ideas. British users are more active than Russian ones and are always ready to take part in political discussions. This can be accounted for by, at least, two factors. One of them is a long tradition of participatory democracy in Great Britain which presupposes open discussions of political issues aimed at achieving rationally motivated consensus. The other –a high level of online activity of British politicians. Findings can help PR-practitioners to improve the use of social networking sites by Russian politicians to increase the impact of political communication on the public.
俄罗斯和英国政治家对社交网络平台Twitter的使用:比较分析
最近媒体向计算机控制的基础设施的转变已经从根本上影响了社会和社会生活的各个领域。这篇论文的重点是政客们越来越多地采用社交网站,试图促进与公众的更好沟通。为了考察社交网络平台在政治传播中的使用,本文在政治媒介化的理论背景下对三位俄罗斯和三位英国政治家的Twitter账户进行了比较分析。“媒体化”的概念预设了一个社会变革过程,在这个过程中,媒体的影响力越来越大,并深入融入社会的不同领域。政治也不例外。目前,社交网络平台正在改变人们对政治的参与,使政治家对公众更加开放。在研究过程中,采用了定量和定性相结合的方法。研究结果涉及三个方面:政治家使用社交网络与公众分享信息的形式和频率,政治家与公众沟通的社交网络工具的感知有效性,以及政治家与公众的互动程度。结果表明,政治家依靠响应性、互动性和参与度来让用户参与政治进程。调查结果还表明,俄罗斯政客比英国政客使用更少的多媒体工具,在表达自己的想法时也更保守。英国用户比俄罗斯用户更活跃,随时准备参与政治讨论。这至少可以由两个因素来解释。其中之一是英国参与式民主的悠久传统,它以公开讨论政治问题为先决条件,目的是达成理性动机的协商一致意见。另一个是英国政客的高水平网络活动。研究结果可以帮助公关从业者改善俄罗斯政治家对社交网站的使用,以增加政治传播对公众的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信