Computational alternatives in participatory design: putting the t back in socio-technical research

Henrik Korsgaard, C. Klokmose, S. Bødker
{"title":"Computational alternatives in participatory design: putting the t back in socio-technical research","authors":"Henrik Korsgaard, C. Klokmose, S. Bødker","doi":"10.1145/2940299.2940314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper takes its starting point in a concern that Participatory Design (PD) and PD research have lost interest in innovating and reshaping technologies. We examine decades of projects and the current state of affairs and propose computational alternatives as a means of questioning the state of affairs and reintroducing a technical research interest into PD. Computational alternatives are used to systematically question the technological status quo and peak into a possible future; they are material manifestations of our focus and curiosity and can aid us in inquiring into possible socio-technical alternatives. Ultimately we focus on whether (and how) it is possible to maintain a technological research agenda in participatory and user-centered design, without giving up on pursuit of strong conceptual and theoretical insights.","PeriodicalId":144019,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2940299.2940314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

This paper takes its starting point in a concern that Participatory Design (PD) and PD research have lost interest in innovating and reshaping technologies. We examine decades of projects and the current state of affairs and propose computational alternatives as a means of questioning the state of affairs and reintroducing a technical research interest into PD. Computational alternatives are used to systematically question the technological status quo and peak into a possible future; they are material manifestations of our focus and curiosity and can aid us in inquiring into possible socio-technical alternatives. Ultimately we focus on whether (and how) it is possible to maintain a technological research agenda in participatory and user-centered design, without giving up on pursuit of strong conceptual and theoretical insights.
参与式设计中的计算选择:把t放回社会技术研究
本文的出发点是关注参与式设计(PD)和PD研究已经失去了创新和重塑技术的兴趣。我们研究了几十年的项目和当前的事态,并提出了计算替代方案,作为质疑事态和重新引入PD技术研究兴趣的一种手段。计算替代方案用于系统地质疑技术现状并达到可能的未来;它们是我们的注意力和好奇心的物质表现,可以帮助我们探索可能的社会技术替代方案。最终,我们关注是否(以及如何)有可能在参与式和以用户为中心的设计中保持技术研究议程,而不放弃对强大的概念和理论见解的追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信