On the Complexity of Worst-Case Blocking Analysis of Nested Critical Sections

Alexander Wieder, Björn B. Brandenburg
{"title":"On the Complexity of Worst-Case Blocking Analysis of Nested Critical Sections","authors":"Alexander Wieder, Björn B. Brandenburg","doi":"10.1109/RTSS.2014.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurately bounding the worst-case blocking for finite job sets, a special case of the classic sporadic task model of recurrent real-time systems, using either nested FIFO-or priority-ordered locks on multiprocessors is NP-hard. These intractability results are obtained with reductions from the Multiple-Choice Matching problem. The reductions are quite general and do not depend on (1) whether the locks are spin-or suspension-based, or (2) whether global or partitioned scheduling is used, or (3) which scheduling policy is employed (as long as it is work-conserving). Further, we show that, for a special case in which the blocking analysis problem is NP-hard for FIFO- and priority-ordered locks, the problem for unordered spin locks with nested critical sections can be answered in polynomial time by solving a reach ability problem on a suitably constructed graph, although (or rather, because) unordered locks do not offer any acquisition-order guarantees. Finally, we identify several challenging open problems, pertaining both to circumventing the hardness results and to classifying the inherent difficulty of the problem more precisely.","PeriodicalId":353167,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTSS.2014.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Accurately bounding the worst-case blocking for finite job sets, a special case of the classic sporadic task model of recurrent real-time systems, using either nested FIFO-or priority-ordered locks on multiprocessors is NP-hard. These intractability results are obtained with reductions from the Multiple-Choice Matching problem. The reductions are quite general and do not depend on (1) whether the locks are spin-or suspension-based, or (2) whether global or partitioned scheduling is used, or (3) which scheduling policy is employed (as long as it is work-conserving). Further, we show that, for a special case in which the blocking analysis problem is NP-hard for FIFO- and priority-ordered locks, the problem for unordered spin locks with nested critical sections can be answered in polynomial time by solving a reach ability problem on a suitably constructed graph, although (or rather, because) unordered locks do not offer any acquisition-order guarantees. Finally, we identify several challenging open problems, pertaining both to circumventing the hardness results and to classifying the inherent difficulty of the problem more precisely.
嵌套临界截面最坏情况阻塞分析的复杂性
在多处理器上使用嵌套的fifo或优先级顺序锁,精确地限定有限作业集的最坏情况阻塞,这是循环实时系统的经典零星任务模型的一个特殊情况。这些棘手的结果是由多项选择匹配问题的约简得到的。这种减少是非常普遍的,不依赖于(1)锁是基于自旋的还是基于挂起的,(2)是使用全局调度还是分区调度,或(3)采用哪种调度策略(只要它是节省工作的)。此外,我们表明,对于FIFO和优先级顺序锁的阻塞分析问题是np困难的特殊情况,具有嵌套临界区的无序自旋锁的问题可以在多项式时间内通过在适当构造的图上解决到达能力问题来回答,尽管(或者更确切地说,因为)无序锁不提供任何获取顺序保证。最后,我们确定了几个具有挑战性的开放问题,这些问题既涉及回避硬度结果,也涉及更精确地分类问题的固有难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信