Effects and potentials of LEZ in Europe: Do they really work?

D. Leihs
{"title":"Effects and potentials of LEZ in Europe: Do they really work?","authors":"D. Leihs","doi":"10.1109/ITST.2011.6060055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low Emission Zones (LEZ) are the municipalities' response to the European Clean Air Directive, which obliges regional governments to take appropriate measures to not exceed certain thresholds for pollutants like particle matter (PM), NOX, etc Most LEZ are regulating the access for polluting cars, though the regulations are different and act differently in changing the driver's behavior. Mostly, the pollution class is subject to the regulation; mostly it aims at the particle matter emissions, sometimes the vehicle class is considered, sometimes both is combined. The access regulation is either a pure drive ban or a charge has to be paid. Drive bans are easy to implement as they are a variant of traffic law. In addition they work immediately as people are forced to change their habits immediately. Though, pure driving bans are disadvantageous for certain population groups like inactive households or small trade, starting a public debate about the appropriateness of the measure that overshadows environmental opinion making. Moreover, long transition phases and vast exemptions foil the emission targets. By collecting charges, people are not excluded from accessing the city and may adopt according to their individual capabilities and needs. The experience shows that emission targets and public acceptance are well achievable with charged low emission zones. Regarding greenhouse gas (GHG), the general public does not distinguish between pollutants that are threatening health and emissions that promote global warming — in the case of car use, both originate from the same process. Driving ban zones cannot be used as too many people would be excluded; The principle of charged zones though does not excluded from entering the city, but people are encouraged to change mobility behavior according to their capabilities, individual situation and needs. The recently published EC White Paper of Transport targets at a 50% drop of CO2 emissions from private cars in cities. So there is hardly an alternative to changing mobility behavior. Offering electric cars in the shop windows of car vendors is not enough. People need a stimulus to activate behavioral changes.","PeriodicalId":220290,"journal":{"name":"2011 11th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 11th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITST.2011.6060055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Low Emission Zones (LEZ) are the municipalities' response to the European Clean Air Directive, which obliges regional governments to take appropriate measures to not exceed certain thresholds for pollutants like particle matter (PM), NOX, etc Most LEZ are regulating the access for polluting cars, though the regulations are different and act differently in changing the driver's behavior. Mostly, the pollution class is subject to the regulation; mostly it aims at the particle matter emissions, sometimes the vehicle class is considered, sometimes both is combined. The access regulation is either a pure drive ban or a charge has to be paid. Drive bans are easy to implement as they are a variant of traffic law. In addition they work immediately as people are forced to change their habits immediately. Though, pure driving bans are disadvantageous for certain population groups like inactive households or small trade, starting a public debate about the appropriateness of the measure that overshadows environmental opinion making. Moreover, long transition phases and vast exemptions foil the emission targets. By collecting charges, people are not excluded from accessing the city and may adopt according to their individual capabilities and needs. The experience shows that emission targets and public acceptance are well achievable with charged low emission zones. Regarding greenhouse gas (GHG), the general public does not distinguish between pollutants that are threatening health and emissions that promote global warming — in the case of car use, both originate from the same process. Driving ban zones cannot be used as too many people would be excluded; The principle of charged zones though does not excluded from entering the city, but people are encouraged to change mobility behavior according to their capabilities, individual situation and needs. The recently published EC White Paper of Transport targets at a 50% drop of CO2 emissions from private cars in cities. So there is hardly an alternative to changing mobility behavior. Offering electric cars in the shop windows of car vendors is not enough. People need a stimulus to activate behavioral changes.
低经济区在欧洲的影响和潜力:它们真的有效吗?
低排放区(LEZ)是市政当局对欧洲清洁空气指令的回应,该指令要求地方政府采取适当措施,不超过颗粒物质(PM)、氮氧化物等污染物的一定阈值。大多数低排放区都在规范污染汽车的进入,尽管法规不同,在改变驾驶员行为方面的行动也不同。大多数情况下,污染等级受监管;主要针对颗粒物排放,有时考虑车辆类别,有时两者结合。访问规则要么是纯粹的驱动器禁止,要么必须支付费用。驾驶禁令很容易实施,因为它们是交通法的一种变体。此外,他们立即工作,因为人们被迫立即改变他们的习惯。但是,单纯的禁止驾驶对不活跃的家庭或小商贩等特定人群不利,因此,围绕该措施是否合适的舆论争论比环境舆论的形成更为激烈。此外,漫长的过渡阶段和大量的豁免阻碍了排放目标。通过收费,人们不被排除在城市之外,可以根据个人的能力和需要采取行动。经验表明,设立收费的低排放区是很容易达到排放目标和公众接受程度的。关于温室气体(GHG),一般公众不区分威胁健康的污染物和促进全球变暖的排放物——在汽车使用的情况下,两者来自同一个过程。禁止驾驶区不能使用,因为太多人会被排除在外;收费区的原则虽然不排除进入城市,但鼓励人们根据自己的能力、个人情况和需求改变出行行为。最近发布的欧盟交通白皮书的目标是将城市私家车的二氧化碳排放量减少50%。因此,除了改变出行行为,几乎没有其他选择。在汽车销售商的橱窗里提供电动汽车是不够的。人们需要刺激来激活行为改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信