Muddy Waters Capital LLC’s Observations on the Parliamentary Mission Report on Activism Submitted by the Finance, General Economy Control Commission of the French Parliament (‘Assemblée Nationale’) on October 2, 2019
{"title":"Muddy Waters Capital LLC’s Observations on the Parliamentary Mission Report on Activism Submitted by the Finance, General Economy Control Commission of the French Parliament (‘Assemblée Nationale’) on October 2, 2019","authors":"Carson Block","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3499127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper has been addressed by Muddy Waters Capital LLC, a US short seller activist, to two French members of Parliament, as an answer to the recent parliamentary mission report on activism submitted by the French Finance, General Economy and Budgetary Control Commission on October 2, 2019. \n \nIt is argued that this report reflects a profound misunderstanding of the French public authorities of the issues underlying the financial regulation of short selling. The author tries, in the interests of the French capital markets and, in fine, the French economy, to bridge the gulf that separates the French authorities and short sellers. \n \nFor that purpose, it is crossed the most recent academic research on market efficiency, corporate governance and short selling with our practical experience to highlight the report's multiple fallacies, and in particular the idea that short selling can transform into a self-fulfilling prophecy destructive of the operational activity of a company. \n \nPart A starts with a reminder of what short selling is and why it exists. Part B then distinguishes short selling in its broadest meaning from short selling activism. Part C focuses on the \"presumption of the abnormal functioning of capital markets\" that the report proposes to implement when a company is heavily shorted. Part D provides two more illustrations of the conceptual errors made in the report. Finally, we propose four recommendations in Part E whose implementation would, in our view, improve the functioning of French capital markets.","PeriodicalId":434487,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Microeconomics & Industrial Organization eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Microeconomics & Industrial Organization eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3499127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper has been addressed by Muddy Waters Capital LLC, a US short seller activist, to two French members of Parliament, as an answer to the recent parliamentary mission report on activism submitted by the French Finance, General Economy and Budgetary Control Commission on October 2, 2019.
It is argued that this report reflects a profound misunderstanding of the French public authorities of the issues underlying the financial regulation of short selling. The author tries, in the interests of the French capital markets and, in fine, the French economy, to bridge the gulf that separates the French authorities and short sellers.
For that purpose, it is crossed the most recent academic research on market efficiency, corporate governance and short selling with our practical experience to highlight the report's multiple fallacies, and in particular the idea that short selling can transform into a self-fulfilling prophecy destructive of the operational activity of a company.
Part A starts with a reminder of what short selling is and why it exists. Part B then distinguishes short selling in its broadest meaning from short selling activism. Part C focuses on the "presumption of the abnormal functioning of capital markets" that the report proposes to implement when a company is heavily shorted. Part D provides two more illustrations of the conceptual errors made in the report. Finally, we propose four recommendations in Part E whose implementation would, in our view, improve the functioning of French capital markets.
本文由美国空头维权人士浑水资本有限责任公司(Muddy Waters Capital LLC)向两名法国国会议员发表,作为对法国财政、一般经济和预算控制委员会于2019年10月2日提交的关于维权主义的议会任务报告的回应。有人认为,这份报告反映了法国公共当局对卖空金融监管背后的问题的深刻误解。为了法国资本市场的利益,也为了法国经济的利益,作者试图弥合法国当局与卖空者之间的鸿沟。为此,本文将最新的关于市场效率、公司治理和卖空的学术研究与我们的实践经验相结合,以突出该报告的多重谬误,特别是卖空可以转变为对公司经营活动具有破坏性的自我实现预言的观点。A部分首先提醒大家什么是卖空以及它为什么存在。然后,B部分将卖空从最广泛的意义上与卖空激进主义区分开来。C部分侧重于“资本市场异常运作的假设”,该报告建议在公司被严重做空时实施该假设。D部分提供了报告中概念错误的另外两个例子。最后,我们在E部分提出了四项建议,我们认为这些建议的实施将改善法国资本市场的运作。