Investigating Undergraduate Students’ Outline and Essay Writing

Umi Hani, Mia Perlina
{"title":"Investigating Undergraduate Students’ Outline and Essay Writing","authors":"Umi Hani, Mia Perlina","doi":"10.31294/wanastra.v14i1.11640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract  - Writing an essay is quite tricky as it needs more than pouring all ideas in written arrangement. Those ideas must be gathered, organized, and planned to be arranged in an outline. The main goal of this study was aimed at examining the students’ outlines and their essays based on their outlines. To evaluate their outline, the framework was based on the outline checklist proposed by Zemach & Rumisek (2005). This study employed qualitative study and involved 30 students in the third semester of 2020/2021 academic year enrolled in the Essay Writing course, at English Department, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Pamulang (Unpam). The results of constructing an outline, it showed that the highest percentage (73%) in constructing an outline was in organization for paragraphs in the right order. On the other hand, insSupport for each main idea related to the thesis statement had the lowest percentage (40%). However, the results of generating essay writing based on their outline, there were 80% students who were successful following their outline when they created their essay. It can be concluded that most of students when they produced an outline and developed their ideas to write an essay from their outline, they followed their outline. On the other hand, they had challenge in developing support for Each main idea related to the thesis statement.","PeriodicalId":411658,"journal":{"name":"Wanastra : Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wanastra : Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31294/wanastra.v14i1.11640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract  - Writing an essay is quite tricky as it needs more than pouring all ideas in written arrangement. Those ideas must be gathered, organized, and planned to be arranged in an outline. The main goal of this study was aimed at examining the students’ outlines and their essays based on their outlines. To evaluate their outline, the framework was based on the outline checklist proposed by Zemach & Rumisek (2005). This study employed qualitative study and involved 30 students in the third semester of 2020/2021 academic year enrolled in the Essay Writing course, at English Department, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Pamulang (Unpam). The results of constructing an outline, it showed that the highest percentage (73%) in constructing an outline was in organization for paragraphs in the right order. On the other hand, insSupport for each main idea related to the thesis statement had the lowest percentage (40%). However, the results of generating essay writing based on their outline, there were 80% students who were successful following their outline when they created their essay. It can be concluded that most of students when they produced an outline and developed their ideas to write an essay from their outline, they followed their outline. On the other hand, they had challenge in developing support for Each main idea related to the thesis statement.
大学生提纲与论文写作调查研究
摘要——写一篇文章是相当棘手的,因为它需要的不仅仅是把所有的想法都写下来。这些想法必须被收集、组织和计划成一个大纲。这项研究的主要目的是为了检查学生的大纲和他们的文章基于他们的大纲。为了评估他们的大纲,该框架基于Zemach & Rumisek(2005)提出的大纲检查表。本研究采用定性研究的方法,对30名2020/2021学年第三学期就读于帕慕朗大学文学院英语写作课程的学生进行研究。构建大纲的结果表明,构建大纲的最高比例(73%)是按照正确的顺序组织段落。另一方面,与论文陈述相关的每个主要观点的不支持百分比最低(40%)。然而,根据他们的大纲生成论文写作的结果,有80%的学生在他们创作论文时成功地遵循了他们的大纲。可以得出的结论是,大多数学生,当他们产生一个大纲和发展他们的想法,从他们的大纲写一篇文章,他们遵循他们的大纲。另一方面,他们在为与论文陈述相关的每个主要观点提供支持方面面临挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信