Learning Environment of Basic Health Sciences in Private (Integrated) versus Public (Traditional Curriculum) Medical Schools during COVID-19

{"title":"Learning Environment of Basic Health Sciences in Private (Integrated) versus Public (Traditional Curriculum) Medical Schools during COVID-19","authors":"","doi":"10.36283/pjmd11-1/016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\nBackground: Educational environment (EE) plays a pivotal role in the academic growth of a medical student. The objective of the study was to compare the perception of a learning environment in Basic Health Sciences by first and second-year MBBS students of private and public medical colleges in Lahore, Pakistan during Covid-19 using a questionnaire. \n\nMethods: Data was collected from students (146) through a self-reported questionnaire via Google. dox after obtaining consent. A total score between 151 and 200 was considered excellent. A score between 101 and 150 indicated a positive approach while less than 100 was considered problematic. A score >3.5 for individual items indicate the presence of the specific aspect of the educational environment, whereas, <3 score requires attention. The t-test was used for analysis and p<0.05 was considered significant.\n\nResults: Out of 146 students 84(51.21%) were from private medical colleges while 62(42.46%) were from public medical colleges. The students of private medical colleges who follow the integrated curriculum found the learning sessions (27.84±7.40) were more student-centered with supporting online classes (2.75 ± 1.01) (p<0.05). Multiple softwares found that the tutorial sessions improved their problem-solving skills (>2.5). Teachers were helpful in stress management during the pandemic (>3). Proper counselors were employed by the private medical schools to cater to the needs of students who required assistance. \n\nConclusion: A significantly high mean score was obtained from private-sector medical students regarding students’ perception of learning (SPL), students’ perception of teachers (SPT), and students’ academic self-perception (SASP), compared to public medical colleges. \nKeywords: Learning Environment; Questionnaire; Medical Students; Perception; Integrated.","PeriodicalId":231166,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36283/pjmd11-1/016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Educational environment (EE) plays a pivotal role in the academic growth of a medical student. The objective of the study was to compare the perception of a learning environment in Basic Health Sciences by first and second-year MBBS students of private and public medical colleges in Lahore, Pakistan during Covid-19 using a questionnaire. Methods: Data was collected from students (146) through a self-reported questionnaire via Google. dox after obtaining consent. A total score between 151 and 200 was considered excellent. A score between 101 and 150 indicated a positive approach while less than 100 was considered problematic. A score >3.5 for individual items indicate the presence of the specific aspect of the educational environment, whereas, <3 score requires attention. The t-test was used for analysis and p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Out of 146 students 84(51.21%) were from private medical colleges while 62(42.46%) were from public medical colleges. The students of private medical colleges who follow the integrated curriculum found the learning sessions (27.84±7.40) were more student-centered with supporting online classes (2.75 ± 1.01) (p<0.05). Multiple softwares found that the tutorial sessions improved their problem-solving skills (>2.5). Teachers were helpful in stress management during the pandemic (>3). Proper counselors were employed by the private medical schools to cater to the needs of students who required assistance. Conclusion: A significantly high mean score was obtained from private-sector medical students regarding students’ perception of learning (SPL), students’ perception of teachers (SPT), and students’ academic self-perception (SASP), compared to public medical colleges. Keywords: Learning Environment; Questionnaire; Medical Students; Perception; Integrated.
新冠肺炎期间私立(综合)医学院与公立(传统课程)医学院基础健康科学学习环境比较
摘要背景:教育环境对医学生的学业成长起着至关重要的作用。该研究的目的是通过问卷调查,比较巴基斯坦拉合尔私立和公立医学院一年级和二年级MBBS学生在2019冠状病毒病期间对基础健康科学学习环境的看法。方法:采用谷歌自述问卷对146名学生进行数据收集。征得同意后再做。总分在151到200之间被认为是优秀。得分在101到150之间表示积极的方法,而低于100被认为是有问题的方法。单项得分>3.5表示存在教育环境的特定方面,而2.5)。大流行期间,教师对压力管理有帮助(>3)。私立医学院雇用了适当的辅导员,以满足需要帮助的学生的需要。结论:私立医学生在学生学习知觉(SPL)、学生对教师知觉(SPT)和学生学业自我知觉(SASP)方面的平均得分显著高于公立医学生。关键词:学习环境;问卷调查;医学生;知觉;整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信