{"title":"The 'Association in Participation' and the 'Simple Partnership' in the Romanian Civil Code","authors":"Emőd Veress","doi":"10.47745/ausleg.2019.8.1.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, the Romanian monist civil law regulates two types of cooperative structures or companies without legal personality: the ‘societatea simplă’, literally, simple company or, more precisely, simple partnership, and the ‘asociere în participaţie’, literally, association in participation. Both contracts can be used in a traditional non-commercial context but also for business purposes. Therefore, a necessity to delimitate them occurs. This article deals with the difficulties of such a delimitation: sometimes a clear borderline can be drawn, other times the association in participation contract requires that legal practitioners rely on the general rules of simple partnership, which have a complementary and subsidiary character. The objective of the present article is also to analyse the (mandatory and default) character of norms of association in participation, the decision-making procedure of this contractual structure, issues regarding representation, and transfer of partnership rights.","PeriodicalId":135984,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47745/ausleg.2019.8.1.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
At present, the Romanian monist civil law regulates two types of cooperative structures or companies without legal personality: the ‘societatea simplă’, literally, simple company or, more precisely, simple partnership, and the ‘asociere în participaţie’, literally, association in participation. Both contracts can be used in a traditional non-commercial context but also for business purposes. Therefore, a necessity to delimitate them occurs. This article deals with the difficulties of such a delimitation: sometimes a clear borderline can be drawn, other times the association in participation contract requires that legal practitioners rely on the general rules of simple partnership, which have a complementary and subsidiary character. The objective of the present article is also to analyse the (mandatory and default) character of norms of association in participation, the decision-making procedure of this contractual structure, issues regarding representation, and transfer of partnership rights.
目前,罗马尼亚一一论民法规定了两种没有法人资格的合作结构或公司:“societatea simpl”,字面意思是简单公司,或更确切地说,简单合伙,和“asociere n participaţie”,字面意思是参与协会。这两种契约既可以用于传统的非商业环境,也可以用于商业目的。因此,有必要对它们进行划分。本文论述了这种界定的难点:有时可以划出明确的界限,有时参与合同中的关联要求法律从业人员依赖具有互补和辅助性质的简单合伙一般规则。本文的目的还在于分析参与联合规范的(强制性和默认性)特征、这种契约结构的决策程序、有关代表的问题以及合伙权利的转让。