Logic and Metaphysics in Vilnius during 16th–18th Centuries: The Most Important Sources of Vilnius Libraries

Živilė Pabijutaitė
{"title":"Logic and Metaphysics in Vilnius during 16th–18th Centuries: The Most Important Sources of Vilnius Libraries","authors":"Živilė Pabijutaitė","doi":"10.35757/civ.2019.24.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to present the results of research conducted as part of the project Polonica Philosophica Orientalia: namely, to give an overview of the most important logical and metaphysical treatises (both manuscripts and printed editions) written in Vilnius between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries that are currently accessible in some of the Vilnius libraries. Although the research focused primarily on the Vilnius University Library and its  resources, some interesting results were also obtained while researching the Wróblewski Library of the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences. Most sources containing information about the state and the nature of metaphysical and logical investigations conducted in Vilnius during the period  discussed are the manuscripts of lecture courses delivered for the students of Vilnius University and other schools. The analysis of those manuscripts has revealed a strong and long-lasting influence of scholastic Aristotelianism in both logic and metaphysics. Namely, up to the mid-eighteenth century, the main questions discussed in logic were Aristotelian syllogism, the square of opposition and the medieval topics of semantical antinomies, modalities and supposition theory, while investigations into metaphysical issues were limited to commentaries on Aristotle’s theoretical treatises without seriously questioning their main theses. In the second part of the eighteenth century, a moderate shift towards subjectivism and psychologism was  observed in both of these disciplines. This was influenced by modern epistemologists (George Berkeley, John Locke and others). Logicians and metaphysicians of Vilnius University developed an interest in the topics of human understanding and cognition. However, this shift did not take a radical form – while the majority of eighteenth-century authors sought a combination of scholastic and modern ideas, a critical and even hostile stance towards modern philosophy and science is still noticeable in many of the analysed sources. An overview of the research supported by statistical data is followed by some preliminary remarks on how and where investigation of this topic might be continued in the future.","PeriodicalId":350409,"journal":{"name":"Civitas. Studia z Filozofii Polityki","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civitas. Studia z Filozofii Polityki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35757/civ.2019.24.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article is to present the results of research conducted as part of the project Polonica Philosophica Orientalia: namely, to give an overview of the most important logical and metaphysical treatises (both manuscripts and printed editions) written in Vilnius between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries that are currently accessible in some of the Vilnius libraries. Although the research focused primarily on the Vilnius University Library and its  resources, some interesting results were also obtained while researching the Wróblewski Library of the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences. Most sources containing information about the state and the nature of metaphysical and logical investigations conducted in Vilnius during the period  discussed are the manuscripts of lecture courses delivered for the students of Vilnius University and other schools. The analysis of those manuscripts has revealed a strong and long-lasting influence of scholastic Aristotelianism in both logic and metaphysics. Namely, up to the mid-eighteenth century, the main questions discussed in logic were Aristotelian syllogism, the square of opposition and the medieval topics of semantical antinomies, modalities and supposition theory, while investigations into metaphysical issues were limited to commentaries on Aristotle’s theoretical treatises without seriously questioning their main theses. In the second part of the eighteenth century, a moderate shift towards subjectivism and psychologism was  observed in both of these disciplines. This was influenced by modern epistemologists (George Berkeley, John Locke and others). Logicians and metaphysicians of Vilnius University developed an interest in the topics of human understanding and cognition. However, this shift did not take a radical form – while the majority of eighteenth-century authors sought a combination of scholastic and modern ideas, a critical and even hostile stance towards modern philosophy and science is still noticeable in many of the analysed sources. An overview of the research supported by statistical data is followed by some preliminary remarks on how and where investigation of this topic might be continued in the future.
16 - 18世纪维尔纽斯的逻辑学与形而上学:维尔纽斯图书馆最重要的资料来源
这篇文章的目的是展示作为Polonica东方哲学项目的一部分所进行的研究结果:也就是说,概述16世纪至18世纪在维尔纽斯撰写的最重要的逻辑和形而上学论文(手稿和印刷版),这些论文目前在维尔纽斯的一些图书馆中可以找到。虽然这项研究主要集中在维尔纽斯大学图书馆及其资源上,但在研究Wróblewski立陶宛科学院图书馆时也获得了一些有趣的结果。讨论期间在维尔纽斯进行的形而上学和逻辑研究的状态和性质的大多数资料来源是为维尔纽斯大学和其他学校的学生提供的讲座课程的手稿。对这些手稿的分析揭示了经院亚里士多德主义对逻辑学和形而上学的强大而持久的影响。也就是说,直到18世纪中期,逻辑学中讨论的主要问题是亚里士多德的三段论、对立法和中世纪的语义二律背反、模态和假设理论,而对形而上学问题的研究仅限于对亚里士多德理论论文的评论,而没有认真质疑它们的主要论点。在18世纪下半叶,这两个学科都出现了向主观主义和心理主义的温和转变。这受到了现代认识论家(乔治·伯克利,约翰·洛克等人)的影响。维尔纽斯大学的逻辑学家和形而上学家对人类理解和认知的主题产生了兴趣。然而,这种转变并没有采取激进的形式——尽管大多数18世纪的作者寻求学院派和现代思想的结合,但在许多分析过的来源中,对现代哲学和科学的批判甚至敌对立场仍然是显而易见的。在对统计数据支持的研究进行概述之后,对今后如何以及在何处继续进行这一主题的调查进行了一些初步评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信