{"title":"Теория международных отношений в зеркалах «научных картин мира»: что дальше?","authors":"Татьяна Александровна Алексеева","doi":"10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-4-30-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author regards in this article the questions, which are connected with the ontological and epistemological foundations of the theoretical international studies. IR as science refl ects the main features of the dominating at the epoch scientifi c world pictures as the way of cognition. As the term “scientifi c world picture” was formulated by the German philosopher Martin Heidegger as well as by the most prominent scholars of the fi rst part of the 20th century – by M. Planck, A. Einstein, N. Bohr, E. Schrodinger etc. Even if some contribution in the development of sciences was done already in the period of Antiquity and Middle Ages, the scientifi c world picture was formulated only with the transition to Modernity, with the exude of the human being from nature. Being based on the typology, done be the Russian academician philosopher V.S. Stepin . the author regards the specifi cs the main scientifi c world pictures, and their consequences in the classical, non classical and post non classical science. By the way, the IR science with great diffi culties accepts the new worldview, at its main part still functioning in a sense of the Newtonian mechanistic world picture. Even if the attempts have been made to be fi tted into the new scientifi c world pictures, the gap between the natural and social sciences is still diffi cult to overcome, and the usage of the newest world view ideas is still fragmented and even marginal. Because of that the latest attempt to fi nd soma balance between the traditions and innovations, by the most famous constructivist Alexander Wendt with his newest book “quantum Mind and Social Science” deserves through attention and analysis.","PeriodicalId":339296,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Politics Russia","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Politics Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-4-30-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The author regards in this article the questions, which are connected with the ontological and epistemological foundations of the theoretical international studies. IR as science refl ects the main features of the dominating at the epoch scientifi c world pictures as the way of cognition. As the term “scientifi c world picture” was formulated by the German philosopher Martin Heidegger as well as by the most prominent scholars of the fi rst part of the 20th century – by M. Planck, A. Einstein, N. Bohr, E. Schrodinger etc. Even if some contribution in the development of sciences was done already in the period of Antiquity and Middle Ages, the scientifi c world picture was formulated only with the transition to Modernity, with the exude of the human being from nature. Being based on the typology, done be the Russian academician philosopher V.S. Stepin . the author regards the specifi cs the main scientifi c world pictures, and their consequences in the classical, non classical and post non classical science. By the way, the IR science with great diffi culties accepts the new worldview, at its main part still functioning in a sense of the Newtonian mechanistic world picture. Even if the attempts have been made to be fi tted into the new scientifi c world pictures, the gap between the natural and social sciences is still diffi cult to overcome, and the usage of the newest world view ideas is still fragmented and even marginal. Because of that the latest attempt to fi nd soma balance between the traditions and innovations, by the most famous constructivist Alexander Wendt with his newest book “quantum Mind and Social Science” deserves through attention and analysis.
本文探讨了与理论国际研究的本体论基础和认识论基础有关的问题。红外作为一门科学反映了当代科学以图像作为认知方式的主要特征。正如“科学的世界图景”一词是由德国哲学家马丁·海德格尔以及20世纪上半叶最杰出的学者——普朗克、爱因斯坦、玻尔、薛定谔等人共同提出的。即使在古代和中世纪时期对科学的发展已经做出了一些贡献,科学的世界图景只是随着向现代的过渡而形成的,随着人类从自然中解放出来。以类型学为基础,俄罗斯哲学家V.S.斯捷潘(V.S. Stepin)提出了这一观点。具体论述了主要的科学世界图景及其在经典、非经典和后非经典科学中的影响。顺便说一下,红外科学很难接受新的世界观,在其主要部分仍然在牛顿机械论的世界图景中运作。即使已经做出了将其融入新的科学世界图景的尝试,自然科学与社会科学之间的差距仍然难以克服,对最新世界观观念的使用仍然是支离破碎的,甚至是边缘的。正因为如此,最著名的建构主义者亚历山大·温特(Alexander Wendt)在他的新书《量子心灵与社会科学》(quantum Mind and Social Science)中试图在传统与创新之间找到平衡的最新尝试值得我们关注和分析。