Measuring service quality on educational services of engineering curriculum using SERVQUAL model

T. Kiatcharoenpol, N. Subvaranont, P. Pachayamai
{"title":"Measuring service quality on educational services of engineering curriculum using SERVQUAL model","authors":"T. Kiatcharoenpol, N. Subvaranont, P. Pachayamai","doi":"10.1109/ICEED.2017.8251184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is to investigate the perception and service expectation of engineering student to curriculum to measure quality of service. SERQUAL model developed by Parasuraman et al. is used to compare difference between expected and actually services perceived. The model proposes measuring service quality into five service dimensions. The survey was carried out from third and fourth year students in a case study of engineering faculty. The questionnaires of 1536 respondents from 19 curriculums are analyzed. It shows that the average score of perceived service quality in each dimension are as follow: Assurance 4.85, reliable 4.73, Tangible 4.53, empathy 4.72 and responsive 4.3 of full score of 7. The highest dimension is Assurance and the lowest dimension is Responsive. In all dimension by using t-test hypothesis, there are statistically significant difference between expectation and services perceived. Moreover, it is found that services perceived by students in all curriculums are statistically different. The work from this study would be the guideline for management to use to improve the level of education activity and service in engineering faculty.","PeriodicalId":119785,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2017.8251184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is to investigate the perception and service expectation of engineering student to curriculum to measure quality of service. SERQUAL model developed by Parasuraman et al. is used to compare difference between expected and actually services perceived. The model proposes measuring service quality into five service dimensions. The survey was carried out from third and fourth year students in a case study of engineering faculty. The questionnaires of 1536 respondents from 19 curriculums are analyzed. It shows that the average score of perceived service quality in each dimension are as follow: Assurance 4.85, reliable 4.73, Tangible 4.53, empathy 4.72 and responsive 4.3 of full score of 7. The highest dimension is Assurance and the lowest dimension is Responsive. In all dimension by using t-test hypothesis, there are statistically significant difference between expectation and services perceived. Moreover, it is found that services perceived by students in all curriculums are statistically different. The work from this study would be the guideline for management to use to improve the level of education activity and service in engineering faculty.
用SERVQUAL模型衡量工程课程教育服务的服务质量
本研究旨在探讨工科学生对课程的感知与服务期望,以衡量服务品质。使用Parasuraman等人开发的SERQUAL模型来比较期望服务和实际感知服务之间的差异。该模型提出将服务质量度量为五个服务维度。这项调查是在工程学院的一个案例研究中对三年级和四年级学生进行的。对19个课程1536名被调查者的问卷进行了分析。结果表明,感知服务质量各维度的平均得分为:保证4.85,可靠4.73,有形4.53,共情4.72,反应4.3(满分为7分)。最高的维度是保证,最低的维度是响应。在所有维度上,使用t检验假设,期望与服务感知之间存在统计学显著差异。此外,我们发现学生在所有课程中感知到的服务有统计学差异。本研究成果可作为管理部门提高工程学院教育活动和服务水平的参考依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信