Harnessing a ‘Currency Matrix’ for Performance Measurement in Cooperatives: A Multi-Phased Study

Theo Benos, N. Kalogeras, Martin Wetzels, K. Ruyter, J. Pennings
{"title":"Harnessing a ‘Currency Matrix’ for Performance Measurement in Cooperatives: A Multi-Phased Study","authors":"Theo Benos, N. Kalogeras, Martin Wetzels, K. Ruyter, J. Pennings","doi":"10.3390/SU10124536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cooperative organizational form is by nature a sustainable one, which has proved to be resilient in the face of crises and a solid lever in addressing present-day societal challenges. Still, little is known about its socio-economic impact. Also, despite the plethora of studies on cooperative performance, research remains inconclusive about how to best measure it. In fact, scholarly work has largely favored the use of appraisal tools reflecting those of investor-owned firms (IOFs), having undermined the dual idiosyncratic nature of the cooperative organizational form, which is manifest in the business and social-membership objectives. The goal of this article is to fill these gaps by delivering a comprehensive dashboard for cooperative performance assessment that harmonizes business–social aspects and catalogs the basic components for future attempts. To reach this goal, we used an extensive review of empirical research in cooperative performance (phase 1) and a Delphi study with 14 experts (phase 2). In addition, we reviewed comparable research efforts for a business form (social enterprises) that combines business with social goals and faces similar challenges (phase 3). This inquiry was particularly insightful for the social perspective and the overlooked role of cooperatives as a socially-embedded organizational form that hardly documents its societal impact and outreach.","PeriodicalId":352730,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Formal & Informal Structures (Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Formal & Informal Structures (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10124536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

The cooperative organizational form is by nature a sustainable one, which has proved to be resilient in the face of crises and a solid lever in addressing present-day societal challenges. Still, little is known about its socio-economic impact. Also, despite the plethora of studies on cooperative performance, research remains inconclusive about how to best measure it. In fact, scholarly work has largely favored the use of appraisal tools reflecting those of investor-owned firms (IOFs), having undermined the dual idiosyncratic nature of the cooperative organizational form, which is manifest in the business and social-membership objectives. The goal of this article is to fill these gaps by delivering a comprehensive dashboard for cooperative performance assessment that harmonizes business–social aspects and catalogs the basic components for future attempts. To reach this goal, we used an extensive review of empirical research in cooperative performance (phase 1) and a Delphi study with 14 experts (phase 2). In addition, we reviewed comparable research efforts for a business form (social enterprises) that combines business with social goals and faces similar challenges (phase 3). This inquiry was particularly insightful for the social perspective and the overlooked role of cooperatives as a socially-embedded organizational form that hardly documents its societal impact and outreach.
利用“货币矩阵”衡量合作社绩效:一项多阶段研究
合作社组织形式本质上是一种可持续的组织形式,事实证明,它在面对危机时具有弹性,是解决当今社会挑战的坚实杠杆。然而,人们对其社会经济影响知之甚少。此外,尽管有大量关于合作绩效的研究,但关于如何最好地衡量合作绩效的研究仍然没有定论。事实上,学术工作在很大程度上倾向于使用反映投资者所有公司(IOFs)的评估工具,这破坏了合作组织形式的双重特质,这在商业和社会成员目标中是明显的。本文的目标是通过为协作性能评估提供一个全面的指示板来填补这些空白,该指示板协调了业务-社会方面,并为将来的尝试编目了基本组件。为了实现这一目标,我们对合作绩效的实证研究进行了广泛的回顾(第一阶段),并对14位专家进行了德尔福研究(第二阶段)。此外,我们回顾了一种商业形式(社会企业)的可比研究成果,这种商业形式将商业与社会目标结合起来,并面临类似的挑战(第三阶段)。这项调查对合作社的社会视角和被忽视的作用尤其有见地,合作社作为一种嵌入社会的组织形式,几乎没有记录其社会影响和外展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信