How Do Drivers Self-Regulate their Secondary Task Engagements? The Effect of Driving Automation on Touchscreen Interactions and Glance Behavior

Patrick Ebel, Moritz Berger, Christoph Lingenfelder, Andreas Vogelsang
{"title":"How Do Drivers Self-Regulate their Secondary Task Engagements? The Effect of Driving Automation on Touchscreen Interactions and Glance Behavior","authors":"Patrick Ebel, Moritz Berger, Christoph Lingenfelder, Andreas Vogelsang","doi":"10.1145/3543174.3545173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With ever-improving driver assistance systems and large touchscreens becoming the main in-vehicle interface, drivers are more tempted than ever to engage in distracting non-driving-related tasks. However, little research exists on how driving automation affects drivers’ self-regulation when interacting with center stack touchscreens. To investigate this, we employ multilevel models on a real-world driving dataset consisting of 10,139 sequences. Our results show significant differences in drivers’ interaction and glance behavior in response to varying levels of driving automation, vehicle speed, and road curvature. During partially automated driving, drivers are not only more likely to engage in secondary touchscreen tasks, but their mean glance duration toward the touchscreen also increases by 12 % (Level 1) and 20 % (Level 2) compared to manual driving. We further show that the effect of driving automation on drivers’ self-regulation is larger than that of vehicle speed and road curvature. The derived knowledge can facilitate the safety evaluation of infotainment systems and the development of context-aware driver monitoring systems.","PeriodicalId":284749,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3545173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

With ever-improving driver assistance systems and large touchscreens becoming the main in-vehicle interface, drivers are more tempted than ever to engage in distracting non-driving-related tasks. However, little research exists on how driving automation affects drivers’ self-regulation when interacting with center stack touchscreens. To investigate this, we employ multilevel models on a real-world driving dataset consisting of 10,139 sequences. Our results show significant differences in drivers’ interaction and glance behavior in response to varying levels of driving automation, vehicle speed, and road curvature. During partially automated driving, drivers are not only more likely to engage in secondary touchscreen tasks, but their mean glance duration toward the touchscreen also increases by 12 % (Level 1) and 20 % (Level 2) compared to manual driving. We further show that the effect of driving automation on drivers’ self-regulation is larger than that of vehicle speed and road curvature. The derived knowledge can facilitate the safety evaluation of infotainment systems and the development of context-aware driver monitoring systems.
司机如何自我调节他们的次要任务参与?驾驶自动化对触摸屏交互和浏览行为的影响
随着驾驶辅助系统的不断改进和大型触摸屏成为主要的车载界面,司机们比以往任何时候都更想从事与驾驶无关的分散注意力的任务。然而,关于驾驶自动化如何影响驾驶员与中置触摸屏交互时的自我调节的研究很少。为了研究这一点,我们在由10,139个序列组成的真实驾驶数据集上使用了多层模型。我们的研究结果表明,在不同的驾驶自动化水平、车速和道路曲率下,驾驶员的互动和扫视行为存在显著差异。在部分自动驾驶过程中,驾驶员不仅更有可能参与辅助触摸屏任务,而且与手动驾驶相比,他们对触摸屏的平均注视时间也增加了12%(1级)和20%(2级)。研究进一步表明,驾驶自动化对驾驶员自我调节的影响大于车速和道路曲率。所获得的知识可以促进信息娱乐系统的安全评估和环境感知驾驶员监控系统的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信