Humor Critical Discourse Covid-19 Countermeasures

Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH 2020) Pub Date : 2020-12-03 DOI:10.2991/assehr.k.201201.172

Sugeng Adipitoyo, Adam Damanhuri, Danang Wijoyanto

{"title":"Humor Critical Discourse Covid-19 Countermeasures","authors":"Sugeng Adipitoyo, Adam Damanhuri, Danang Wijoyanto","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.201201.172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purposeof this study are to find (1) the historical andsocial contexts contained in the critical humorous discourse of the response to covid-19, (2) thediversity of power that is opposed by the critical discourse of humor against the response to covid-19, and (3) ideology that is upheld by a critical discourse of humor against the response to covid-19.Basedon dominant discourse of overcoming covid-19 (corona virus disease-19) in Indonesia, which does not close to the emergence of all forms of discourse against it. The form of serious discourse against it is considered very dangerous for the makers and disseminators of it, because the right to freedom of opinion has not been properlygranted. Therefore, the form of humorous discourse is an alternative discourse against thedominant discourse developed by people to tackle Covid-19. As a form of critical discourse,humorous discourse is a social practice that always holds historical and social contexts, resistanceto power, and enforcement of certain ideologies. This research relies on the critical discourse analysis approach (critical discourse analysisapproach) as one of the models in qualitative research, by elaborating 4 approaches, namely thesocial cognition approach, the social change approach, the historical approach, and the French orideological approach. Data in the form of critical humorous discourse on the response to covid-19was collected through accessible social media (WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook). Data wereanalyzed using interpretive methods furhter. This research is expected to find concepts and propositions about (1) the historical andsocial context contained in the critical humorous discourse of the response to covid-19; (2) thediversity of power that is opposed by the critical discourse of humor against the response to covid-19; and (3) ideology that is upheld by a critical discourse of humor against the response to covid-19. These concepts and propositions can be used as the basis for policy","PeriodicalId":151829,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH 2020)","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purposeof this study are to find (1) the historical andsocial contexts contained in the critical humorous discourse of the response to covid-19, (2) thediversity of power that is opposed by the critical discourse of humor against the response to covid-19, and (3) ideology that is upheld by a critical discourse of humor against the response to covid-19.Basedon dominant discourse of overcoming covid-19 (corona virus disease-19) in Indonesia, which does not close to the emergence of all forms of discourse against it. The form of serious discourse against it is considered very dangerous for the makers and disseminators of it, because the right to freedom of opinion has not been properlygranted. Therefore, the form of humorous discourse is an alternative discourse against thedominant discourse developed by people to tackle Covid-19. As a form of critical discourse,humorous discourse is a social practice that always holds historical and social contexts, resistanceto power, and enforcement of certain ideologies. This research relies on the critical discourse analysis approach (critical discourse analysisapproach) as one of the models in qualitative research, by elaborating 4 approaches, namely thesocial cognition approach, the social change approach, the historical approach, and the French orideological approach. Data in the form of critical humorous discourse on the response to covid-19was collected through accessible social media (WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook). Data wereanalyzed using interpretive methods furhter. This research is expected to find concepts and propositions about (1) the historical andsocial context contained in the critical humorous discourse of the response to covid-19; (2) thediversity of power that is opposed by the critical discourse of humor against the response to covid-19; and (3) ideology that is upheld by a critical discourse of humor against the response to covid-19. These concepts and propositions can be used as the basis for policy

查看原文本刊更多论文

幽默批判性话语新冠肺炎对策

本研究的目的是找出(1)应对covid-19的批判性幽默话语所包含的历史和社会语境，(2)应对covid-19的幽默批评话语所反对的权力多样性，以及(3)应对covid-19的幽默批评话语所支持的意识形态。基于印度尼西亚克服covid-19(冠状病毒病-19)的主流话语，这与出现各种形式的对抗它的话语并不接近。对它的制造者和传播者来说，反对它的严肃言论的形式被认为是非常危险的，因为言论自由的权利没有得到适当的授予。因此，幽默话语形式是人们为应对新冠肺炎而形成的一种替代话语。幽默话语作为批判话语的一种形式，是一种始终具有历史和社会背景、对权力的反抗和对某种意识形态的强制执行的社会实践。本研究以批判话语分析方法(critical discourse analysisapproach)为质性研究的模式之一，阐述了社会认知方法、社会变迁方法、历史方法、法国或意识形态方法等4种方法。通过可访问的社交媒体(WhatsApp、Instagram和Facebook)收集了关于应对covid-19的批判性幽默话语形式的数据。进一步采用解释方法对数据进行分析。本研究希望找到以下概念和命题:(1)应对covid-19的批判性幽默话语中包含的历史和社会背景;(2)应对covid-19的幽默批评话语所反对的权力多样性;(3)以幽默的批判性话语支持的意识形态，反对应对covid-19。这些概念和主张可以作为政策的基础

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH 2020)

自引率

0.00%

发文量