Outcomes of Entropion Repair in Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid Compared to Other Cicatricial Etiologies: A Retrospective Study

Braun Hayley A, Schaffer Lauren, Cole Emily F, Risk Benjamin B, Kim Hee Joon, Feldman Ron
{"title":"Outcomes of Entropion Repair in Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid Compared to Other Cicatricial Etiologies: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Braun Hayley A, Schaffer Lauren, Cole Emily F, Risk Benjamin B, Kim Hee Joon, Feldman Ron","doi":"10.36959/587/598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP) can lead to severe conjunctival scarring and cicatricial entropion, which often necessitates repair. Surgical manipulation can increase the risk of inflammation, scarring, and disease progression. The objective of this study was to understand the characteristics of OCP patients who received entropion repairs and determine the difference in entropion recurrence or revision in patients with OCP or other cicatricial entropion repair. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed from January 2010 to June 2020. OCP patients from an autoimmune blistering disease clinic with entropion repair were compared to patients with repair of cicatricial entropion of other etiology. A generalized estimating equation assessed for evidence of recurrence of entropion or required revision. Results: 19 OCP patients with cicatricial entropion and 60 patients with cicatricial entropion secondary to other etiologies received 38 and 75 entropion repairs, respectively. No difference in prevalence of revision or recurrence was found between groups. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that in a population of OCP patients where the majority were systemically immunosuppressed, the likelihood of entropion recurrence or further repair was no different than that for repair of cicatricial entropion of other etiology.","PeriodicalId":243850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/587/598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP) can lead to severe conjunctival scarring and cicatricial entropion, which often necessitates repair. Surgical manipulation can increase the risk of inflammation, scarring, and disease progression. The objective of this study was to understand the characteristics of OCP patients who received entropion repairs and determine the difference in entropion recurrence or revision in patients with OCP or other cicatricial entropion repair. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed from January 2010 to June 2020. OCP patients from an autoimmune blistering disease clinic with entropion repair were compared to patients with repair of cicatricial entropion of other etiology. A generalized estimating equation assessed for evidence of recurrence of entropion or required revision. Results: 19 OCP patients with cicatricial entropion and 60 patients with cicatricial entropion secondary to other etiologies received 38 and 75 entropion repairs, respectively. No difference in prevalence of revision or recurrence was found between groups. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that in a population of OCP patients where the majority were systemically immunosuppressed, the likelihood of entropion recurrence or further repair was no different than that for repair of cicatricial entropion of other etiology.
眼瘢痕性类天疱疮的Entropion修复效果与其他瘢痕性病因的比较:一项回顾性研究
背景:眼瘢痕性类天疱疮(OCP)可导致严重的结膜瘢痕和瘢痕内翻,通常需要修复。手术操作可增加炎症、瘢痕形成和疾病进展的风险。本研究的目的是了解接受内翻修复术的OCP患者的特征,并确定OCP或其他瘢痕性内翻修复术患者内翻复发或修复的差异。方法:2010年1月至2020年6月进行回顾性图表回顾。我们将来自一家自身免疫性水疱病诊所的有内翻修复的OCP患者与有其他病因的瘢痕性内翻修复的患者进行比较。一种广义的估计方程,用于评估熵翻复发的证据或需要修改的证据。结果:19例OCP瘢痕内翻患者和60例继发于其他原因的瘢痕内翻患者分别接受了38例和75例的内翻修复。两组间的修复率和复发率无差异。结论:本研究提供的证据表明,在大多数系统性免疫抑制的OCP患者群体中,内翻复发或进一步修复的可能性与其他病因的瘢痕性内翻修复的可能性没有区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信