Removing ECG artifacts from the EMG: A comparison between combining empirical-mode decomposition and independent component analysis and other filtering methods

Kwang-Jin Lee, Boreom Lee
{"title":"Removing ECG artifacts from the EMG: A comparison between combining empirical-mode decomposition and independent component analysis and other filtering methods","authors":"Kwang-Jin Lee, Boreom Lee","doi":"10.1109/ICCAS.2013.6703888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surface electromyography (EMG) is used for rehabilitation and clinical treatment for muscle disease. However, these recordings are often critically contaminated by cardiac artifact and many methods are applied to EMG in order to remove the artifacts from the EMG signals. We applied to both simulation and real EMG data a recently developed method of a combination of ensemble empirical mode decomposition and independent component analysis (EEMD+ICA), and compared its performance with that of other previously developed filtering methods. Relative root-mean-square errors (RRMSE) and correlations between the cleaned EMG and ECG contaminated EMG were calculated to evaluate the performance. The EMD based single channel technique showed better performance compared to the cubic smoothing spline and high-pass-filter (HPF) method for varied amplitude without a reference signal. Therefore, if the reference signal is not present, the combined EEMD and ICA procedure prove to be a reliable and efficient tool for removing ECG artifact from surface EMG.","PeriodicalId":415263,"journal":{"name":"2013 13th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2013)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 13th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2013)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2013.6703888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Surface electromyography (EMG) is used for rehabilitation and clinical treatment for muscle disease. However, these recordings are often critically contaminated by cardiac artifact and many methods are applied to EMG in order to remove the artifacts from the EMG signals. We applied to both simulation and real EMG data a recently developed method of a combination of ensemble empirical mode decomposition and independent component analysis (EEMD+ICA), and compared its performance with that of other previously developed filtering methods. Relative root-mean-square errors (RRMSE) and correlations between the cleaned EMG and ECG contaminated EMG were calculated to evaluate the performance. The EMD based single channel technique showed better performance compared to the cubic smoothing spline and high-pass-filter (HPF) method for varied amplitude without a reference signal. Therefore, if the reference signal is not present, the combined EEMD and ICA procedure prove to be a reliable and efficient tool for removing ECG artifact from surface EMG.
从肌电图中去除心电伪影:结合经验模式分解和独立分量分析及其他滤波方法的比较
表面肌电图(EMG)用于肌肉疾病的康复和临床治疗。然而,这些记录经常受到心脏伪影的严重污染,为了从肌电信号中去除伪影,许多方法应用于肌电图。我们将最近开发的集成经验模态分解和独立分量分析(EEMD+ICA)相结合的方法应用于模拟和真实肌电数据,并将其性能与其他先前开发的滤波方法进行了比较。计算清洗后的肌电信号和污染后的肌电信号的相对均方根误差(RRMSE)和相关性,以评估其性能。在无参考信号的情况下,基于EMD的单通道技术比三次光滑样条和高通滤波(HPF)方法具有更好的变幅性能。因此,如果参考信号不存在,EEMD和ICA相结合的方法被证明是一种可靠而有效的工具,可以从表面肌电信号中去除心电伪影。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信