The Financial Services Industry and Society the Role of Incentives/Punishments, Moral Hazard, and Conflicts of Interests in the 2008 Financial Crisis

N. Murray, A. Manrai, Lalita A. Manrai
{"title":"The Financial Services Industry and Society the Role of Incentives/Punishments, Moral Hazard, and Conflicts of Interests in the 2008 Financial Crisis","authors":"N. Murray, A. Manrai, Lalita A. Manrai","doi":"10.1108/JEFAS-02-2017-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This paper aims to present an analysis of the role of financial incentives, moral hazard and conflicts of interests leading up to the 2008 financial crisis. Design/methodology/approach – The study’s analysis has identified common structural flaws throughout the securitization food chain. These structural flaws include inappropriate incentives, the absence of punishment, moral hazard and conflicts of interest. This research sees the full impact of these structural flaws when considering their co-occurrence throughout the financial system. The authors address systemic defects in the securitization food chain and examine the inter-relationships among homeowners, mortgage originators, investment banks and investors. The authors also address the role of exogenous factors, including the SEC, AIG, the credit rating agencies, Congress, business academia and the business media. Findings – The study argues that the lack of criminal prosecutions of key financial executives has been a key factor in creating moral hazard. Eight years after the Great Recession ended in the USA, the financial services industry continues to suffer from a crisis of trust with society. Practical implications – An overwhelming majority of Americans, 89 per cent, believe that the federal government does a poor job of regulating the financial services industry (Puzzanghera, 2014). A study argues that the current corporate lobbying framework undermines societal expectations of political equality and consent (Alzola, 2013). The authors believe the Singapore model may be a useful starting point to restructure regulatory agencies so that they are more responsive to societal concerns and less responsive to special interests. Finally, the widespread perception is that the financial services sector, in particular, is ethically challenged (Ferguson, 2012); perhaps there would be some benefit from the implementation of ethical climate monitoring in firms that have been subject to deferred prosecution agreements for serious ethical violations (Arnaud, 2010). Originality/value – The authors believe the paper makes a truly original contribution. They provide new insights via their analysis of the role of financial incentives, moral hazard and conflicts of interests leading up to the 2008 financial crisis.","PeriodicalId":283702,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Financial Crises (Monetary) (Topic)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Financial Crises (Monetary) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-02-2017-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to present an analysis of the role of financial incentives, moral hazard and conflicts of interests leading up to the 2008 financial crisis. Design/methodology/approach – The study’s analysis has identified common structural flaws throughout the securitization food chain. These structural flaws include inappropriate incentives, the absence of punishment, moral hazard and conflicts of interest. This research sees the full impact of these structural flaws when considering their co-occurrence throughout the financial system. The authors address systemic defects in the securitization food chain and examine the inter-relationships among homeowners, mortgage originators, investment banks and investors. The authors also address the role of exogenous factors, including the SEC, AIG, the credit rating agencies, Congress, business academia and the business media. Findings – The study argues that the lack of criminal prosecutions of key financial executives has been a key factor in creating moral hazard. Eight years after the Great Recession ended in the USA, the financial services industry continues to suffer from a crisis of trust with society. Practical implications – An overwhelming majority of Americans, 89 per cent, believe that the federal government does a poor job of regulating the financial services industry (Puzzanghera, 2014). A study argues that the current corporate lobbying framework undermines societal expectations of political equality and consent (Alzola, 2013). The authors believe the Singapore model may be a useful starting point to restructure regulatory agencies so that they are more responsive to societal concerns and less responsive to special interests. Finally, the widespread perception is that the financial services sector, in particular, is ethically challenged (Ferguson, 2012); perhaps there would be some benefit from the implementation of ethical climate monitoring in firms that have been subject to deferred prosecution agreements for serious ethical violations (Arnaud, 2010). Originality/value – The authors believe the paper makes a truly original contribution. They provide new insights via their analysis of the role of financial incentives, moral hazard and conflicts of interests leading up to the 2008 financial crisis.
金融服务业与社会:激励/惩罚、道德风险和利益冲突在2008年金融危机中的作用
目的-本文旨在分析导致2008年金融危机的金融激励、道德风险和利益冲突的作用。设计/方法论/方法——该研究的分析发现了整个证券化食物链中常见的结构性缺陷。这些结构性缺陷包括不恰当的激励、缺乏惩罚、道德风险和利益冲突。当考虑到这些结构性缺陷在整个金融体系中同时出现时,本研究看到了它们的全部影响。作者解决了证券化食物链中的系统性缺陷,并研究了房主、抵押贷款发起人、投资银行和投资者之间的相互关系。作者还讨论了外部因素的作用,包括美国证券交易委员会、美国国际集团、信用评级机构、国会、商业学术界和商业媒体。调查结果-该研究认为,缺乏对主要金融高管的刑事起诉是造成道德风险的一个关键因素。在美国经济大衰退结束八年后,金融服务业继续遭受社会信任危机的困扰。实际影响-绝大多数美国人(89%)认为联邦政府在监管金融服务业方面做得很差(Puzzanghera, 2014)。一项研究认为,目前的企业游说框架破坏了社会对政治平等和同意的期望(Alzola, 2013)。这组作者认为,新加坡模式可能是重组监管机构的一个有用的起点,这样它们就能对社会问题做出更多的反应,而对特殊利益做出更少的反应。最后,普遍的看法是,金融服务部门,特别是,是道德挑战(弗格森,2012);也许在那些因严重违反道德规范而受到延期起诉协议的公司中实施道德气候监测会有一些好处(Arnaud, 2010)。原创性/价值——作者认为论文做出了真正的原创性贡献。他们通过分析导致2008年金融危机的金融激励、道德风险和利益冲突的作用,提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信