Skeptisisme Teori Common Link G.H.A Juynboll Terhadap Otentisitas Hadis dan Bantahan Kepadanya

Faizurrizqi -, Zakiy Muflih Nugraha
{"title":"Skeptisisme Teori Common Link G.H.A Juynboll Terhadap Otentisitas Hadis dan Bantahan Kepadanya","authors":"Faizurrizqi -, Zakiy Muflih Nugraha","doi":"10.32505/al-bukhari.v5i1.3677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"G.H.A Juynboll is an orientalist figure of skepticism who is popular as the developer of the common link theory  initiated by Joseph Schacht. Juynboll claims that the validity of his theory can replace conventional hadith study methods which he deems irrelevant to be used to research the authenticity of hadith. Various responses have come from other hadith scholars questioning the validity and performance of the theory in determining the authenticity of hadith. The common link itself is the oldest narrator term in the isnad file which is considered the most responsible for passing on hadith to more than one student. Azami as one of the scholars of hadith who strongly criticizes this theory says that Juynboll only has his imagination in developing thetheory common link. In response to this, Juynboll tries to provide his arguments to strengthen thetheory common link by explaining the working principle of the theory and its logical reasons, then he provides a comparison between the common link and the conventional method in studying hadith from its various aspects in order to conclude which theory which is more suitable for use in researching a hadith.","PeriodicalId":407271,"journal":{"name":"Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v5i1.3677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

G.H.A Juynboll is an orientalist figure of skepticism who is popular as the developer of the common link theory  initiated by Joseph Schacht. Juynboll claims that the validity of his theory can replace conventional hadith study methods which he deems irrelevant to be used to research the authenticity of hadith. Various responses have come from other hadith scholars questioning the validity and performance of the theory in determining the authenticity of hadith. The common link itself is the oldest narrator term in the isnad file which is considered the most responsible for passing on hadith to more than one student. Azami as one of the scholars of hadith who strongly criticizes this theory says that Juynboll only has his imagination in developing thetheory common link. In response to this, Juynboll tries to provide his arguments to strengthen thetheory common link by explaining the working principle of the theory and its logical reasons, then he provides a comparison between the common link and the conventional method in studying hadith from its various aspects in order to conclude which theory which is more suitable for use in researching a hadith.
对共同理论的怀疑与山神性的真实性和对山神性的反驳是一致的
G.H.A Juynboll是一位东方主义的怀疑主义人物,他是约瑟夫·沙赫特提出的共同联系理论的创始人。Juynboll声称,他的理论的有效性可以取代传统的圣训研究方法,他认为这些方法与研究圣训的真实性无关。来自其他圣训学者的各种回应质疑该理论在确定圣训真实性方面的有效性和表现。公共链接本身是isnad文件中最古老的叙述者术语,它被认为是最负责将圣训传递给多个学生的。作为圣训学者之一的阿扎米强烈批评了这一理论,他认为朱恩伯尔在发展这一理论的共同联系上只是他的想象。针对这一点,Juynboll试图通过解释理论的工作原理及其逻辑原因来提供他的论据来加强理论的共同联系,然后他从各个方面比较了共同联系和传统的研究圣训的方法,以得出哪种理论更适合用于研究圣训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信