ARTISTIC SELF-REFLECTION AS THE MECHANISM OF LITERATURE SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE CONTEXT OF TRANSITIONAL ARTISTIC THINKING

O. Shtepenko
{"title":"ARTISTIC SELF-REFLECTION AS THE MECHANISM OF LITERATURE SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE CONTEXT OF TRANSITIONAL ARTISTIC THINKING","authors":"O. Shtepenko","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-146-9/99-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The literary self-reflection is a universal mechanism traditionalizing the achievements of literature, renewing the artistic paradigm, and at the same time it is a perspective of comprehension of cultural crises and aesthetic changes. The coverage of this phenomenon in the Modern and Postmodern literature allows choosing it as a consideration aspect of the dynamics and vectors of literary search, especially in the transitional epochs, marked by the change of ideological and aesthetic guidelines as well as established scientific reception methods of art Writer’s self-knowledge is closely connected with the complex of global philosophical, cultural and aesthetic problems; it reflects the changes of world images, human concepts and the dynamics of artistic thinking types. The unceasing process of meta-description in literature has some insufficiently studied rhythms, forms and strategies, the definition and description of which is a relevant problem, becoming more acute at the crucial stages of literature development. Self-reflection acquired a distinctive intensity in the 20 century that allowed R. Barthes to characterize this period as “an age of reflections on what is literature”. The process covered many national literatures and was reflected in well-known works, acknowledged as the classics of the 20 century. As stated by O. Keba, the landmark works of the 20 century were written according to “a meta-textual pattern, characterized by the framework narratives and narrators’ attempts to comprehend the essence of the narration, the specifics of the storytelling process itself and its impact on listeners”.","PeriodicalId":384646,"journal":{"name":"DEVELOPMENT OF PHILOLOGY AND LINGUISTICS AT THE MODERN HISTORICAL PERIOD","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEVELOPMENT OF PHILOLOGY AND LINGUISTICS AT THE MODERN HISTORICAL PERIOD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-146-9/99-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The literary self-reflection is a universal mechanism traditionalizing the achievements of literature, renewing the artistic paradigm, and at the same time it is a perspective of comprehension of cultural crises and aesthetic changes. The coverage of this phenomenon in the Modern and Postmodern literature allows choosing it as a consideration aspect of the dynamics and vectors of literary search, especially in the transitional epochs, marked by the change of ideological and aesthetic guidelines as well as established scientific reception methods of art Writer’s self-knowledge is closely connected with the complex of global philosophical, cultural and aesthetic problems; it reflects the changes of world images, human concepts and the dynamics of artistic thinking types. The unceasing process of meta-description in literature has some insufficiently studied rhythms, forms and strategies, the definition and description of which is a relevant problem, becoming more acute at the crucial stages of literature development. Self-reflection acquired a distinctive intensity in the 20 century that allowed R. Barthes to characterize this period as “an age of reflections on what is literature”. The process covered many national literatures and was reflected in well-known works, acknowledged as the classics of the 20 century. As stated by O. Keba, the landmark works of the 20 century were written according to “a meta-textual pattern, characterized by the framework narratives and narrators’ attempts to comprehend the essence of the narration, the specifics of the storytelling process itself and its impact on listeners”.
艺术自我反思:艺术思维转型语境下文学自我意识的机制
文学自我反思是文学成就传统化、艺术范式更新的一种普遍机制,同时也是对文化危机和审美变迁的一种理解视角。这一现象在现代和后现代文学中的覆盖范围使我们可以将其作为文学搜索的动力和载体的考虑方面,特别是在以思想和美学指导方针的变化以及建立科学的艺术接受方法为标志的过渡时期。作家的自我认识与全球哲学、文化和美学问题的复杂性密切相关;它反映了世界意象、人的观念和艺术思维类型的动态变化。文学中元描述不断发展的过程中,存在着一些研究不足的节奏、形式和策略,对其进行界定和描述是一个相关的问题,在文学发展的关键阶段变得更加尖锐。自我反思在20世纪获得了一种独特的强度,这使得R. Barthes将这一时期描述为“一个反思什么是文学的时代”。这一过程涵盖了许多民族文学,并反映在知名作品中,被公认为20世纪的经典。正如O. Keba所说,20世纪具有里程碑意义的作品是按照“一种元文本模式,其特点是框架叙事和叙述者试图理解叙事的本质、讲故事过程本身的细节及其对听众的影响”来写作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信