Enhancing Teaching Computational Thinking: a Systematic Mapping of Pedagogical Patterns

L. Atieno, M. Turcsányi-Szabó
{"title":"Enhancing Teaching Computational Thinking: a Systematic Mapping of Pedagogical Patterns","authors":"L. Atieno, M. Turcsányi-Szabó","doi":"10.15584/jetacomps.2022.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efforts to enhance understanding Computational thinking (CT) are curtailed by: (i) problem solving complexity linked to implementing a new subject; and (ii) teaching CT for problem solving is a new field. Unfortunately, the only support available are pedagogic theories and anecdotal explaining other’s practice. Implementing these theories can be challenging, hence continuous research on realistic methods of sharing successful and commendable practice amongst educators, necessitating this study. Systematic Mapping (SM) was used with the following steps: research questions formulation; identifying keywords; identifying source databases; defining inclusion and exclusion criteria; constructing the search string; conduct the search; data extraction; and presentation of results. 22 studies were selected with the majority being solution proposal research. The identified pedagogical patterns were mapped to the 5Es of Framework of Action. Several patterns for solving assessment related problems were also identified hence the inclusion of the 6th E (Evaluation).","PeriodicalId":266274,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education, Technology and Computer Science","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education, Technology and Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/jetacomps.2022.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efforts to enhance understanding Computational thinking (CT) are curtailed by: (i) problem solving complexity linked to implementing a new subject; and (ii) teaching CT for problem solving is a new field. Unfortunately, the only support available are pedagogic theories and anecdotal explaining other’s practice. Implementing these theories can be challenging, hence continuous research on realistic methods of sharing successful and commendable practice amongst educators, necessitating this study. Systematic Mapping (SM) was used with the following steps: research questions formulation; identifying keywords; identifying source databases; defining inclusion and exclusion criteria; constructing the search string; conduct the search; data extraction; and presentation of results. 22 studies were selected with the majority being solution proposal research. The identified pedagogical patterns were mapped to the 5Es of Framework of Action. Several patterns for solving assessment related problems were also identified hence the inclusion of the 6th E (Evaluation).
加强教学计算思维:教学模式的系统映射
加强理解计算思维(CT)的努力受到以下因素的限制:(i)与实施新主题相关的问题解决复杂性;(2)解决问题的CT教学是一个新的领域。不幸的是,唯一可用的支持是教育学理论和解释他人实践的轶事。实施这些理论是具有挑战性的,因此,持续研究在教育工作者之间分享成功和值得赞扬的实践的现实方法是必要的。系统映射(SM)的使用步骤如下:研究问题的制定;识别关键字;识别源数据库;确定纳入和排除标准;构造搜索字符串;进行搜索;数据提取;以及结果的展示。22项研究被选中,大多数是解决方案建议研究。已确定的教学模式与《行动框架》的5e相对应。还确定了解决与评价有关的问题的几种模式,因此列入了第六次E(评价)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信