Measuring Project’S Team Culture in Projects Using the Last Planner System

G. J. Lühr, M. Bosch-Rekveldt
{"title":"Measuring Project’S Team Culture in Projects Using the Last Planner System","authors":"G. J. Lühr, M. Bosch-Rekveldt","doi":"10.24928/2019/0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At this stage, construction industry is known for bad project performances and a culture characterized by adversarial behaviours. The Last Planner  System (LPS) is designed to improve these circumstances through the enhancement of workflow reliability by involving various disciplines in joint planning processes and a culture of collaboration. How to actually measure related project team culture (PTC) is unknown at this stage. This paper tries to close this gap and compares two defined versions of the Ideal Lean Culture for organizations with the actual PTC in projects using the LPS. It first presents the two Ideal Lean Cultures for organizations, based on a framework developed for organizations (the Competing Values Framework - CVF). Next, it examines on the basis of three case studies the applicability of the CVF for measuring the actual culture in project teams using the LPS and compares it with the named Ideal Lean Culture conditions. The paper concludes that the CVF is a suitable tool to take a snapshot of the PTC and that the comparison to the Ideal Lean Culture can give conclusions about the current project team’s maturity in projects using the LPS.","PeriodicalId":278113,"journal":{"name":"Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24928/2019/0124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At this stage, construction industry is known for bad project performances and a culture characterized by adversarial behaviours. The Last Planner  System (LPS) is designed to improve these circumstances through the enhancement of workflow reliability by involving various disciplines in joint planning processes and a culture of collaboration. How to actually measure related project team culture (PTC) is unknown at this stage. This paper tries to close this gap and compares two defined versions of the Ideal Lean Culture for organizations with the actual PTC in projects using the LPS. It first presents the two Ideal Lean Cultures for organizations, based on a framework developed for organizations (the Competing Values Framework - CVF). Next, it examines on the basis of three case studies the applicability of the CVF for measuring the actual culture in project teams using the LPS and compares it with the named Ideal Lean Culture conditions. The paper concludes that the CVF is a suitable tool to take a snapshot of the PTC and that the comparison to the Ideal Lean Culture can give conclusions about the current project team’s maturity in projects using the LPS.
使用Last Planner系统测量项目中的团队文化
在这个阶段,建筑业以糟糕的项目绩效和以对抗行为为特征的文化而闻名。Last Planner系统(LPS)旨在通过在联合规划过程中涉及不同学科和协作文化来提高工作流程的可靠性,从而改善这些情况。在这个阶段,如何实际度量相关的项目团队文化(PTC)是未知的。本文试图缩小这一差距,并将组织理想精益文化的两个定义版本与使用LPS的项目中的实际PTC进行比较。它首先提出了两种理想的组织精益文化,基于为组织开发的框架(竞争价值框架- CVF)。接下来,在三个案例研究的基础上,它检查了CVF在使用LPS测量项目团队实际文化的适用性,并将其与命名的理想精益文化条件进行比较。本文的结论是,CVF是一个合适的工具来拍摄PTC的快照,并且与理想精益文化的比较可以得出关于当前项目团队在使用LPS的项目中的成熟度的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信