ENSURING ECONOMIC SECURITY OF THE COUNTRY ON THE BASIS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF WORLD ANTI-CORRUPTION MODELS AND DETERMINANTS OF THEIR FUNCTIONING

Abstract

The article considers the concept of "corruption", the essence of which depends on the scope of its application. There is no single definition of this definition. The sources of corruption, the origins of domestic corruption actions have been studied and indicated, as well as such groups of causes of corruption as: political, economic, social, legal and organizational. It is established that corruption has a negative impact on the economic development of the country and contributes to the eco-nomic danger of the state. Two leading models of anti-corruption activities have been identified: Singaporean or Asian and Swedish or Scandinavian. The essence of the first is to implement a vertical strategy aimed at obtaining quick results, the result of which is not the complete elimination of corruption, but finding a level that is acceptable for both government and society. The second model is the application of a horizontal strategy aimed at the consistent implementation of anti-corruption activities based on anti-corruption incentives. The countries that use the first model primarily include: Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, the second is used by countries such as Sweden, Finland, Denmark, the Netherlands and others. The article examines the experience of these countries in implementing anti-corruption models, through which they managed to develop effective mechanisms to combat corruption, reduce its volume and establish control over the activities of officials, based on which they identified and studied the determinants used to prevent and overcoming corruption. The analysis of foreign experience in combating, preventing and combating corruption has made it possible to identify leading trends, mechanisms and tools, the adaptation of which can be useful for our country. These are, first of all, such as: formation of a conscious civil society on intolerance of corruption through constant informational explanations about the negativity of this phenomenon, implementation of various anti-corruption programs and projects; intensifying the activities of public organizations and expanding their influence on anti-corruption processes by effectively introducing their represent-atives to the supervisory and advisory boards of public administration bodies; application of anti-corruption measures, mainly of preventive and encouraging nature; expanding the involvement of e-government, Internet platforms, interactive websites in order to quickly respond to citizens' reports of facts that contain corruption components.