Design Process adoption: A Survey in the Brazilian Software Industry

Tainah Chaves, Ana Paula Da C. Filgueira, Katleen Karla B. Picanço, Jaqueline S. Araujo, F. Giuntini, F. Santos
{"title":"Design Process adoption: A Survey in the Brazilian Software Industry","authors":"Tainah Chaves, Ana Paula Da C. Filgueira, Katleen Karla B. Picanço, Jaqueline S. Araujo, F. Giuntini, F. Santos","doi":"10.1109/CLEI56649.2022.9959961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a growing concern in the software industries to ensure that systems have usable interfaces, and it is common for the professional designer to be responsible for pursuing this goal. Given the different design processes available in the literature and the different background of professionals, in this paper we seek to understand how the adoption and definition of the design process occurs in the Brazilian software industry. At first, we carried out an online survey, seeking information about professional experiences and the application of design processes. We selected ten survey respondents to be interviewed. We obtained 73 responses with the survey, from which 78% apply a design process, with Design Thinking being the most cited. By conducting the interviews, we found that the processes applied are usually defined according to the project type, while professionals who do not apply processes report a lack of appreciation of the designer’s work by the team. The results highlight differences in how each company proceeds about its performance in the design sector. Overall, our results suggest that design processes bring a substantial positive impact to the projects they are applied to.","PeriodicalId":156073,"journal":{"name":"2022 XVLIII Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 XVLIII Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI56649.2022.9959961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing concern in the software industries to ensure that systems have usable interfaces, and it is common for the professional designer to be responsible for pursuing this goal. Given the different design processes available in the literature and the different background of professionals, in this paper we seek to understand how the adoption and definition of the design process occurs in the Brazilian software industry. At first, we carried out an online survey, seeking information about professional experiences and the application of design processes. We selected ten survey respondents to be interviewed. We obtained 73 responses with the survey, from which 78% apply a design process, with Design Thinking being the most cited. By conducting the interviews, we found that the processes applied are usually defined according to the project type, while professionals who do not apply processes report a lack of appreciation of the designer’s work by the team. The results highlight differences in how each company proceeds about its performance in the design sector. Overall, our results suggest that design processes bring a substantial positive impact to the projects they are applied to.
采用设计流程:巴西软件业调查
在软件行业中,越来越多的人关注确保系统具有可用的界面,并且通常由专业设计人员负责实现这一目标。鉴于文献中不同的设计过程和不同的专业背景,在本文中,我们试图理解设计过程的采用和定义是如何在巴西软件工业中发生的。首先,我们进行了一项在线调查,寻求有关专业经验和设计流程应用的信息。我们选择了十位调查对象进行访谈。我们从调查中获得了73份回复,其中78%的人应用了设计过程,其中设计思维是被引用最多的。通过进行访谈,我们发现应用的过程通常是根据项目类型定义的,而不应用过程的专业人员报告说团队缺乏对设计师工作的欣赏。调查结果凸显了每家公司在设计领域表现的差异。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,设计过程对它们所应用的项目产生了实质性的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信