A comparative study to assess the nutritional status of the preschools children under ICDS and Non-ICDS schools in selected rural community, Dehradun

Shanti Bhandari, A. Nawaz, Jeewan Pokhrel
{"title":"A comparative study to assess the nutritional status of the preschools children under ICDS and Non-ICDS schools in selected rural community, Dehradun","authors":"Shanti Bhandari, A. Nawaz, Jeewan Pokhrel","doi":"10.33545/26641348.2020.v2.i2a.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Throughout the world the children are most vulnerable, neglected during their sensitive period of growth and development, which increase morbidity and mortality rate. The emphasis on child development has been on improving the quality of services under Integrated Child Development Service.Methods and Materials: A non-experimental survey approach with comparative research design. The sample consisted 60 preschool children aged between 3 to 6 years under the ICDS and Non-ICDS schools were selected by purposive sampling technique in Abinav Children's Academy School, Balawala, Anangwadi Center in Kuanwala and Doiwala at Dehradun. Data was collected by using anthropometric measurements and structured observational checklist.Results: There was significant difference statistically, between the nutritional status of preschool children of ICDS School, majority of 56.7% preschool school were healthy and least number of 43.3% preschool children were underweight whereas in Non-ICDS School majority of 86.7% preschool children were healthy and least number of 13.3% were underweight. The data revealed that the obtained t-value is greater than the table value at 0.05 levels therefore, there is significant difference in overall nutritional status of preschool children under ICDS and Non-ICDS Schools. The obtained chi-square value for selected demographic variables is greater than the table value at 0.05level of significance. Hence, research hypothesis is accepted and null hypothesis is rejected. Conclusion: The investigator had analyzed the data that, among 30 preschool children under ICDS and 30 preschool children under Non-ICDS, the comparison of nutritional status for both groups by observational checklist, the mean of overall nutrition status in ICDS children is higher than Non-ICDS children. Hence, the study concludes that, the nutritional statuses of children under Non- ICDS School were well nourished than the children under ICDS School.","PeriodicalId":413423,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Psychiatric Nursing","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Psychiatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26641348.2020.v2.i2a.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Throughout the world the children are most vulnerable, neglected during their sensitive period of growth and development, which increase morbidity and mortality rate. The emphasis on child development has been on improving the quality of services under Integrated Child Development Service.Methods and Materials: A non-experimental survey approach with comparative research design. The sample consisted 60 preschool children aged between 3 to 6 years under the ICDS and Non-ICDS schools were selected by purposive sampling technique in Abinav Children's Academy School, Balawala, Anangwadi Center in Kuanwala and Doiwala at Dehradun. Data was collected by using anthropometric measurements and structured observational checklist.Results: There was significant difference statistically, between the nutritional status of preschool children of ICDS School, majority of 56.7% preschool school were healthy and least number of 43.3% preschool children were underweight whereas in Non-ICDS School majority of 86.7% preschool children were healthy and least number of 13.3% were underweight. The data revealed that the obtained t-value is greater than the table value at 0.05 levels therefore, there is significant difference in overall nutritional status of preschool children under ICDS and Non-ICDS Schools. The obtained chi-square value for selected demographic variables is greater than the table value at 0.05level of significance. Hence, research hypothesis is accepted and null hypothesis is rejected. Conclusion: The investigator had analyzed the data that, among 30 preschool children under ICDS and 30 preschool children under Non-ICDS, the comparison of nutritional status for both groups by observational checklist, the mean of overall nutrition status in ICDS children is higher than Non-ICDS children. Hence, the study concludes that, the nutritional statuses of children under Non- ICDS School were well nourished than the children under ICDS School.
德拉敦某农村社区ICDS学校与非ICDS学校学龄前儿童营养状况的比较研究
背景:在世界各地,儿童是最脆弱的,在他们生长发育的敏感时期受到忽视,这增加了发病率和死亡率。儿童发展的重点是改善综合儿童发展服务下的服务质量。方法与材料:采用比较研究设计的非实验调查方法。本研究采用目的抽样方法,选取了60名年龄在3 - 6岁的学龄前儿童,分别来自Abinav儿童学院学校、Balawala、Kuanwala的Anangwadi中心和dehradon的Doiwala。采用人体测量法和结构化观察表收集数据。结果:ICDS学校学龄前儿童营养状况差异有统计学意义,56.7%学龄前儿童多数健康,43.3%学龄前儿童体重不足,非ICDS学校86.7%学龄前儿童多数健康,13.3%学龄前儿童体重不足。数据显示,所得t值在0.05水平上大于表中值,说明ICDS与非ICDS学校学龄前儿童总体营养状况存在显著差异。所得人口学变量的卡方值在0.05的显著性水平上大于表值。因此,研究假设被接受,零假设被拒绝。结论:研究者分析了30例ICDS组学龄前儿童和30例非ICDS组学龄前儿童的数据,通过观察性检查表比较两组儿童的营养状况,ICDS组儿童总体营养状况的平均值高于非ICDS组儿童。因此,本研究得出结论:非ICDS学校儿童的营养状况比ICDS学校儿童的营养状况好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信