Cross-National Policy Learning in Health System Reform: The Case of Diagnosis Related Groups

Achim Schmid, R. Götze
{"title":"Cross-National Policy Learning in Health System Reform: The Case of Diagnosis Related Groups","authors":"Achim Schmid, R. Götze","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-246X.2009.01344.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observations of policy convergence and the cross-national diffusion of ideas, knowledge and policies have raised the question about the ways countries might learn from their peers. This article examines the role of cross-national learning with regard to Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs). We review the spread of this policy instrument and analyse the implementation of DRGs in three late-adopting countries: Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands. The three cases show that the implementation of this policy instrument required intense studies, cooperation with stakeholders and adjustment to country-specific needs. The countries learned from foreign experience, but it was only with the introduction of a regulatory framework for competition between sickness funds that DRGs came fully onto the political agenda. While Germany and Switzerland drew upon foreign DRG models, the Netherlands developed an alternative system to classify patients according to case-mix.","PeriodicalId":338399,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: International Social Security Review","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: International Social Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.2009.01344.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Observations of policy convergence and the cross-national diffusion of ideas, knowledge and policies have raised the question about the ways countries might learn from their peers. This article examines the role of cross-national learning with regard to Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs). We review the spread of this policy instrument and analyse the implementation of DRGs in three late-adopting countries: Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands. The three cases show that the implementation of this policy instrument required intense studies, cooperation with stakeholders and adjustment to country-specific needs. The countries learned from foreign experience, but it was only with the introduction of a regulatory framework for competition between sickness funds that DRGs came fully onto the political agenda. While Germany and Switzerland drew upon foreign DRG models, the Netherlands developed an alternative system to classify patients according to case-mix.
医疗体制改革中的跨国政策学习:以诊断相关群体为例
对政策趋同和思想、知识和政策的跨国传播的观察提出了一个问题,即各国可以如何向同类国家学习。本文探讨了跨国学习在诊断相关小组(DRGs)中的作用。我们回顾了这一政策工具的推广情况,并分析了三个较晚采用这一政策的国家(德国、瑞士和荷兰)实施可持续发展目标的情况。这三个案例表明,执行这一政策工具需要深入研究、与利益攸关方合作以及根据具体国家需要进行调整。这些国家吸取了国外的经验,但只有在引入疾病基金之间竞争的监管框架后,DRGs才被完全提上了政治议程。德国和瑞士借鉴了国外的DRG模式,而荷兰则开发了另一种系统,根据病例组合对患者进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信