Comparison of the Sensitivity of Sterility Tests Based on the Analysis of 2x2 Contingency Tables

Stanislav V. Yefimov
{"title":"Comparison of the Sensitivity of Sterility Tests Based on the Analysis of 2x2 Contingency Tables","authors":"Stanislav V. Yefimov","doi":"10.36346/sarjps.2022.v04i04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work is devoted to statistical methods for determining the comparative sensitivity of sterility analyzers with a binary scale: 1/0, +/-. The paper considers both traditional statistical test methods namely the direct binomial test, the McNemar test, and the new, highly sensitive Yefimov Method, and Pearson-Yefimov statistical test. First, the comparative effectiveness of statistical methods for assessing the sensitivity of testers is demonstrated on a specially developed model system (the Test Bench), and then on real experimental data. The data were obtained during the validation of a new tester and a new method for analyzing samples for sterility. The new method is compared with the old one, the certified method. The sensitivity of both new and old methods (testers) was already determined earlier by a direct non-statistical method, which allowed us to compare the results of the two approaches. The factors influencing the efficiency of statistical tests are revealed and described.","PeriodicalId":244449,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"57 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjps.2022.v04i04.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The work is devoted to statistical methods for determining the comparative sensitivity of sterility analyzers with a binary scale: 1/0, +/-. The paper considers both traditional statistical test methods namely the direct binomial test, the McNemar test, and the new, highly sensitive Yefimov Method, and Pearson-Yefimov statistical test. First, the comparative effectiveness of statistical methods for assessing the sensitivity of testers is demonstrated on a specially developed model system (the Test Bench), and then on real experimental data. The data were obtained during the validation of a new tester and a new method for analyzing samples for sterility. The new method is compared with the old one, the certified method. The sensitivity of both new and old methods (testers) was already determined earlier by a direct non-statistical method, which allowed us to compare the results of the two approaches. The factors influencing the efficiency of statistical tests are revealed and described.
基于2x2列联表分析的不育检测灵敏度比较
这项工作致力于统计方法,以确定无菌分析仪的比较灵敏度与二进制刻度:1/0,+/-。本文考虑了传统的统计检验方法,即直接二项检验、McNemar检验和新的、高灵敏度的Yefimov方法,以及Pearson-Yefimov统计检验。首先,在专门开发的模型系统(测试台)上验证了评估测试仪灵敏度的统计方法的比较有效性,然后在实际实验数据上进行了验证。这些数据是在对一种新的无菌检测仪器和分析样品的新方法进行验证时获得的。并将新方法与旧的认证方法进行了比较。新旧方法(测试器)的灵敏度已经通过一种直接的非统计方法确定,这允许我们比较两种方法的结果。揭示并描述了影响统计检验效率的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信