It is difficult to think about complex things (tools of new pedagogical thinking)

I. A. Leskova
{"title":"It is difficult to think about complex things (tools of new pedagogical thinking)","authors":"I. A. Leskova","doi":"10.7256/2454-0676.2023.3.38432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A new level of systemic complexity of the tasks facing modern education determines the need to search for new thinking tools that ensure their solution. This is the reason for the relevance of this research, the purpose of which is to offer a new thinking tool that provides the opportunity to think complexly and about complex things, to view an object, for example, education, as a complex whole, i.e. included through the generality of the constitutive basis in a system of diverse connections and interactions$ Qualitatively compress large arrays of heterogeneous information, integrate (collect) it into semantic coherence. In the process of scientific research, methods of scientific theorization were used in the context of the ideas of post-nonclassical science and on its methodological basis. The article considers the structure of the ontological representation as a tool of thinking, which is understood as the order of division of the world in the consciousness of society (how the meaning of this representation organizes consciousness). This is the scientific novelty of the study. Using the example of a traditional learning system, the fundamental influence of the structure of the ontological representation in which it is built (the separation between the subjective world and the objective world) is shown. From this position, four structural markers of this system and its basic meanings (ontological, anthropological, etc.) are identified. Their presence in educational (in) innovations indicates that these (in) innovations are a variant of the traditional learning system, respectively, the quality of the educational result and its inconsistency with the challenges of the time are common. The analysis of FGOS 4.0 — the first digital standard confirms this. The article examines the structure of the ontological foundation of a new education system capable of responding to the challenges of the time, its basic meanings are highlighted. It is concluded that in the new system, along with new educational opportunities, the educational opportunities of the traditional system of education should be used.\n","PeriodicalId":259901,"journal":{"name":"Педагогика и просвещение","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Педагогика и просвещение","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0676.2023.3.38432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A new level of systemic complexity of the tasks facing modern education determines the need to search for new thinking tools that ensure their solution. This is the reason for the relevance of this research, the purpose of which is to offer a new thinking tool that provides the opportunity to think complexly and about complex things, to view an object, for example, education, as a complex whole, i.e. included through the generality of the constitutive basis in a system of diverse connections and interactions$ Qualitatively compress large arrays of heterogeneous information, integrate (collect) it into semantic coherence. In the process of scientific research, methods of scientific theorization were used in the context of the ideas of post-nonclassical science and on its methodological basis. The article considers the structure of the ontological representation as a tool of thinking, which is understood as the order of division of the world in the consciousness of society (how the meaning of this representation organizes consciousness). This is the scientific novelty of the study. Using the example of a traditional learning system, the fundamental influence of the structure of the ontological representation in which it is built (the separation between the subjective world and the objective world) is shown. From this position, four structural markers of this system and its basic meanings (ontological, anthropological, etc.) are identified. Their presence in educational (in) innovations indicates that these (in) innovations are a variant of the traditional learning system, respectively, the quality of the educational result and its inconsistency with the challenges of the time are common. The analysis of FGOS 4.0 — the first digital standard confirms this. The article examines the structure of the ontological foundation of a new education system capable of responding to the challenges of the time, its basic meanings are highlighted. It is concluded that in the new system, along with new educational opportunities, the educational opportunities of the traditional system of education should be used.
很难思考复杂的事情(新教学思维的工具)
现代教育面临的任务的系统复杂性达到了一个新的水平,这决定了我们需要寻找新的思维工具来确保这些任务的解决。这就是本研究具有相关性的原因,其目的是提供一种新的思维工具,为复杂地思考和思考复杂的事物提供机会,将对象(例如教育)视为一个复杂的整体,即通过构成基础的一般性包括在各种连接和相互作用的系统中。定性地压缩大量异构信息,将其整合(收集)为语义连贯。在科学研究的过程中,科学理论化的方法是在后非经典科学思想的背景下运用的,是在后非经典科学的方法论基础上运用的。本文认为本体论表征的结构是一种思维工具,它被理解为社会意识中世界的划分秩序(这种表征的意义是如何组织意识的)。这是这项研究在科学上的新奇之处。本文以一个传统的学习系统为例,展示了构建该系统的本体表示结构(主观世界与客观世界的分离)的基本影响。从这一立场出发,确定了这一体系的四个结构标志及其基本意义(本体论的、人类学的等)。它们在教育创新中的存在表明,这些创新是传统学习系统的一种变体,教育结果的质量及其与时代挑战的不一致是常见的。第一个数字标准FGOS 4.0的分析证实了这一点。本文考察了一种能够应对时代挑战的新型教育体系的本体论基础结构,突出了其基本意义。在新的教育体制下,伴随着新的教育机会,传统教育体制的教育机会应该得到利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信