Participatory design with older adults: an analysis of creativity in the design of mobile healthcare applications

J. Davidson, Carlos Jensen
{"title":"Participatory design with older adults: an analysis of creativity in the design of mobile healthcare applications","authors":"J. Davidson, Carlos Jensen","doi":"10.1145/2466627.2466652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers often use participatory design -- involving endusers in technology ideation -- as this is found to lead to more useful and relevant products. Researchers have sought to involve older adults in the design of emerging technologies like smartphones, with which older adults often have little experience. Therefore, their effectiveness as co-designers could be questioned. We examine whether older adults can create novel design ideas, and whether critiquing existing applications prior to ideation helps or hinders creativity. Panelists from industry and academia evaluated design ideas generated by focus groups of older adults. Out of five groups, the most creative design idea came from one with no smartphone experience or critique exposure. We found that while only some designs scored high on the novelty dimension of creativity, participants were enthusiastic about participating and adapted quickly. We found evidence that critiquing existing applications prior to ideation did more harm than good, potentially due to design fixation. We recommend continuing to involve older adults in the technology design ideation phase.","PeriodicalId":333903,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"80","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2466627.2466652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

Abstract

Researchers often use participatory design -- involving endusers in technology ideation -- as this is found to lead to more useful and relevant products. Researchers have sought to involve older adults in the design of emerging technologies like smartphones, with which older adults often have little experience. Therefore, their effectiveness as co-designers could be questioned. We examine whether older adults can create novel design ideas, and whether critiquing existing applications prior to ideation helps or hinders creativity. Panelists from industry and academia evaluated design ideas generated by focus groups of older adults. Out of five groups, the most creative design idea came from one with no smartphone experience or critique exposure. We found that while only some designs scored high on the novelty dimension of creativity, participants were enthusiastic about participating and adapted quickly. We found evidence that critiquing existing applications prior to ideation did more harm than good, potentially due to design fixation. We recommend continuing to involve older adults in the technology design ideation phase.
老年人的参与式设计:移动医疗应用程序设计中的创造力分析
研究人员经常使用参与式设计——让终端用户参与技术创意——因为这被发现会产生更有用、更相关的产品。研究人员试图让老年人参与智能手机等新兴技术的设计,老年人通常对这些技术缺乏经验。因此,他们作为共同设计者的有效性可能会受到质疑。我们研究老年人是否可以创造新颖的设计想法,以及在产生想法之前批评现有的应用程序是否有助于或阻碍创造力。来自工业界和学术界的小组成员评估了老年人焦点小组产生的设计想法。在五组中,最具创意的设计想法来自没有智能手机经验或批评的人。我们发现,虽然只有一些设计在创意的新颖性方面得分很高,但参与者对参与的热情和适应的速度都很快。我们发现有证据表明,在构思之前批评现有的应用程序弊大于利,这可能是由于设计固定。我们建议继续让老年人参与技术设计构思阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信