Bibliometrics, a useful tool within the field of research

Karla Salinas-Ríos, Angélica Janneire García López
{"title":"Bibliometrics, a useful tool within the field of research","authors":"Karla Salinas-Ríos, Angélica Janneire García López","doi":"10.29057/jbapr.v3i6.6829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The activity in scientific research has been able to be studied, measured, compared, analyzed and objectified through Scientometrics, discipline that applies to all the literature of scientific character, mathematical and statistical methods, thus achieving, that social aspects of science can be quantified. From the scientific literature, scientific publications (tangible products of the research) are derived, which are specifically studied by the bibliometrics. This last one, is a branch of the Scientometrics, that is guided under the assumption that the scientific discoveries and the research results are published in scientific journals, so its unit of analysis is the scientific article. The word bibliometrics was defined for first time by Alan Pritchard in 1969, and since then, multiple concepts of this term have been developed. However, it has reached to the consensus that this methodological tool allows to know the scientific production (in quantity, quality and impact) on various topics, journals, authors and countries, among others. Its main research lines are the methodology for bibliometrics, the scientific disciplines and the health management and policies. Likewise, it has descriptive, evaluation and supervision/monitoring functions of the research activity, on which its classification into levels (micro, meso and maso) will depend directly. Because it has components from various sciences, among them the mathematics, its methodology and theory are based on mathematical models, from which the bibliometric indicators are derived. Although there are other types of research such as systematic reviews and meta-analyzes, these, require a better management in the field of research and of the statistical measurement, as well as more resources. On the other hand, a bibliometric study owns the nobility of being within the reach of students and researchers due to its methodology, practicality, relevance, resource saving, potential to extend to most of the scientific areas, multiple applications and favoring the fact of not committing ethical misconduct related to research. Finally, although bibliometrics is often underestimated, its power and importance as a tool to manage evidence-based knowledge and to serve as a basis for other types of studies such as systematic reviews must be emphasized.","PeriodicalId":235136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Applied Psychology Research","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Applied Psychology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29057/jbapr.v3i6.6829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The activity in scientific research has been able to be studied, measured, compared, analyzed and objectified through Scientometrics, discipline that applies to all the literature of scientific character, mathematical and statistical methods, thus achieving, that social aspects of science can be quantified. From the scientific literature, scientific publications (tangible products of the research) are derived, which are specifically studied by the bibliometrics. This last one, is a branch of the Scientometrics, that is guided under the assumption that the scientific discoveries and the research results are published in scientific journals, so its unit of analysis is the scientific article. The word bibliometrics was defined for first time by Alan Pritchard in 1969, and since then, multiple concepts of this term have been developed. However, it has reached to the consensus that this methodological tool allows to know the scientific production (in quantity, quality and impact) on various topics, journals, authors and countries, among others. Its main research lines are the methodology for bibliometrics, the scientific disciplines and the health management and policies. Likewise, it has descriptive, evaluation and supervision/monitoring functions of the research activity, on which its classification into levels (micro, meso and maso) will depend directly. Because it has components from various sciences, among them the mathematics, its methodology and theory are based on mathematical models, from which the bibliometric indicators are derived. Although there are other types of research such as systematic reviews and meta-analyzes, these, require a better management in the field of research and of the statistical measurement, as well as more resources. On the other hand, a bibliometric study owns the nobility of being within the reach of students and researchers due to its methodology, practicality, relevance, resource saving, potential to extend to most of the scientific areas, multiple applications and favoring the fact of not committing ethical misconduct related to research. Finally, although bibliometrics is often underestimated, its power and importance as a tool to manage evidence-based knowledge and to serve as a basis for other types of studies such as systematic reviews must be emphasized.
文献计量学是研究领域内的一个有用工具
科学研究中的活动可以通过科学计量学进行研究、测量、比较、分析和客观化,科学计量学适用于所有具有科学特征的文献、数学和统计方法,从而实现科学的社会方面可以量化。从科学文献中衍生出科学出版物(研究的有形产品),通过文献计量学对其进行具体研究。最后一个,是科学计量学的一个分支,它的指导假设是科学发现和研究结果发表在科学期刊上,所以它的分析单位是科学文章。1969年,Alan Pritchard首次定义了文献计量学这个词,从那时起,这个术语的多个概念被开发出来。然而,它已经达成共识,即这种方法工具可以了解各种主题、期刊、作者和国家等的科学生产(数量、质量和影响)。它的主要研究方向是文献计量学方法论、科学学科和卫生管理与政策。同样,它具有研究活动的描述、评价和监督/监测功能,其分类(微观、中观和宏观)将直接取决于这些功能。由于它具有包括数学在内的各种科学的组成部分,它的方法论和理论都是建立在数学模型的基础上的,文献计量指标是由数学模型推导出来的。虽然还有其他类型的研究,如系统综述和元分析,但这些研究需要在研究领域和统计测量方面有更好的管理,以及更多的资源。另一方面,文献计量学研究由于其方法论、实用性、相关性、资源节约、扩展到大多数科学领域的潜力、多种应用以及有利于避免与研究相关的道德不端行为,因此具有学生和研究人员可以接触到的高贵性。最后,虽然文献计量学经常被低估,但它作为管理循证知识的工具的力量和重要性,以及作为其他类型研究(如系统评价)的基础,必须得到强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信