Indonesian Newsroom Management on Uyghur News Coverage

Narayana Mahendra Prastya, Fikri S. Pambudi, Ida Nuraini Dewi Kodrat Ningsih
{"title":"Indonesian Newsroom Management on Uyghur News Coverage","authors":"Narayana Mahendra Prastya, Fikri S. Pambudi, Ida Nuraini Dewi Kodrat Ningsih","doi":"10.12928/channel.v10i2.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The case of the Uyghur ethnic in Xinjiang, China, has drawn global attention, and so has the media coverage of this issue. In Indonesia, the Uyghur issue attracts people’s attention due to religious sentiment. This article aims to determine how Indonesian mass media newsroom management is in Uyghur news coverage. Much previous research discusses how Indonesian media news coverage towards the Uyghur issue, but most use content analysis methods. Meanwhile, the primary data of this article is an interview with the journalist. Two media, Tempo and Republika, have been chosen as the subject matter, as both have different ideologies: human rights (Tempo) and Islam (Republika). The results show that both media use psychological proximity as a consideration in choosing information and news angles for the Uyghur issue. In organizing, both media do not form specific teams or order journalists based on particular skills to cover it. In the fundamental phase, both media admit difficulties in news coverage due to the limited access in Xinjiang directly, so for the news that happens in China. They can only use foreign news agencies, then rewrite the information to contextual the issue for Indonesian readers. For issues related to Uyghur in Indonesia, both media gather the information by direct reporting and interviewing Indonesian government officials or Islamic organizations. For the controlling phase, Republika did formal and informal procedures. Meanwhile, Tempo uses feedback from readers mentioned on social media and a board called Ombudsman.","PeriodicalId":121846,"journal":{"name":"CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v10i2.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The case of the Uyghur ethnic in Xinjiang, China, has drawn global attention, and so has the media coverage of this issue. In Indonesia, the Uyghur issue attracts people’s attention due to religious sentiment. This article aims to determine how Indonesian mass media newsroom management is in Uyghur news coverage. Much previous research discusses how Indonesian media news coverage towards the Uyghur issue, but most use content analysis methods. Meanwhile, the primary data of this article is an interview with the journalist. Two media, Tempo and Republika, have been chosen as the subject matter, as both have different ideologies: human rights (Tempo) and Islam (Republika). The results show that both media use psychological proximity as a consideration in choosing information and news angles for the Uyghur issue. In organizing, both media do not form specific teams or order journalists based on particular skills to cover it. In the fundamental phase, both media admit difficulties in news coverage due to the limited access in Xinjiang directly, so for the news that happens in China. They can only use foreign news agencies, then rewrite the information to contextual the issue for Indonesian readers. For issues related to Uyghur in Indonesia, both media gather the information by direct reporting and interviewing Indonesian government officials or Islamic organizations. For the controlling phase, Republika did formal and informal procedures. Meanwhile, Tempo uses feedback from readers mentioned on social media and a board called Ombudsman.
印尼新闻编辑室对维吾尔族新闻报道的管理
中国新疆维吾尔族事件引起了国际社会的广泛关注,也引起了媒体的广泛关注。在印尼,维吾尔人问题因为宗教情感而引起人们的关注。本文旨在确定印尼大众传媒编辑室管理在维吾尔新闻报道中的作用。许多先前的研究讨论了印尼媒体对维吾尔问题的新闻报道,但大多数使用内容分析方法。同时,本文的主要数据是对记者的采访。选择Tempo和Republika两种媒体作为主题,因为它们具有不同的意识形态:人权(Tempo)和伊斯兰(Republika)。结果表明,两家媒体在选择维吾尔问题的信息和新闻角度时,都将心理接近作为考虑因素。在组织过程中,两家媒体都没有组建特定的团队,也没有根据特定的技能安排记者进行报道。在基本阶段,两家媒体都承认,由于直接进入新疆的渠道有限,新闻报道存在困难,对于发生在中国的新闻来说也是如此。他们只能使用外国新闻机构,然后为印尼读者改写相关信息。对于与印尼维吾尔族有关的问题,两家媒体都通过直接报道和采访印尼政府官员或伊斯兰组织来收集信息。在控制阶段,Republika进行了正式和非正式的程序。与此同时,Tempo使用了社交媒体上提到的读者的反馈和一个名为Ombudsman的委员会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信