Preliminary Guidelines for Human-Agent Teams in Space Operations Beyond Low-Earth Orbit

Güliz Tokadll, M. Dorneich, Tomas Gonzalez-Torres
{"title":"Preliminary Guidelines for Human-Agent Teams in Space Operations Beyond Low-Earth Orbit","authors":"Güliz Tokadll, M. Dorneich, Tomas Gonzalez-Torres","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2018.8569523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents preliminary guidelines for function allocation in human-agent teams in space missions beyond Low-Earth Orbit (LEO). The current space missions in LEO are supported by real-time collaboration between the space crew and a mission control to deal with any off-nominal situations. For the space missions beyond LEO, the communication delay between an Earth-based mission control and the space crew will limit the guidance a mission control can provide during off-nominal situations, where no procedure exists. This will require that the space crew must detect, diagnose and generate alternative solutions without the real-time support of mission control during the decision-making process. The previous experiences and the training of the space crew may not have anticipated every situation. The generation of new procedures or modification of existing procedures will be a very challenging and time-consuming tasks for the space crew. Therefore, missions beyond LEO will increasingly rely on intelligent automation capabilities to support the space crew's decision-making in real-time. In previous work, the authors generated the domain knowledge models, described the design requirements, and identified the possible concept of future operations. In this paper, a Decision-Action Diagram (DAD) of missions in LEO has been extrapolated to missions beyond LEO. This DAD describes the envisioned collaborative decision-making process of missions beyond LEO for off-nominal situations. The comparison between the DAD of missions beyond LEO and the DAD of current missions in LEO shows that some of the functions performed by mission control would be allocated to a Cognitive Assistant (CA) (intelligent automation) of the space crew in the space vehicle. To allocate functions properly, preliminary guidelines are described to determine: (a) which functions could potentially be allocated to the human or an agent, (b) the potential triggers of the current situation that would determine when functions are dynamically allocated, and (c) the level of automation logic of the CA for each allocated function.","PeriodicalId":405724,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"2690 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2018.8569523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper presents preliminary guidelines for function allocation in human-agent teams in space missions beyond Low-Earth Orbit (LEO). The current space missions in LEO are supported by real-time collaboration between the space crew and a mission control to deal with any off-nominal situations. For the space missions beyond LEO, the communication delay between an Earth-based mission control and the space crew will limit the guidance a mission control can provide during off-nominal situations, where no procedure exists. This will require that the space crew must detect, diagnose and generate alternative solutions without the real-time support of mission control during the decision-making process. The previous experiences and the training of the space crew may not have anticipated every situation. The generation of new procedures or modification of existing procedures will be a very challenging and time-consuming tasks for the space crew. Therefore, missions beyond LEO will increasingly rely on intelligent automation capabilities to support the space crew's decision-making in real-time. In previous work, the authors generated the domain knowledge models, described the design requirements, and identified the possible concept of future operations. In this paper, a Decision-Action Diagram (DAD) of missions in LEO has been extrapolated to missions beyond LEO. This DAD describes the envisioned collaborative decision-making process of missions beyond LEO for off-nominal situations. The comparison between the DAD of missions beyond LEO and the DAD of current missions in LEO shows that some of the functions performed by mission control would be allocated to a Cognitive Assistant (CA) (intelligent automation) of the space crew in the space vehicle. To allocate functions properly, preliminary guidelines are described to determine: (a) which functions could potentially be allocated to the human or an agent, (b) the potential triggers of the current situation that would determine when functions are dynamically allocated, and (c) the level of automation logic of the CA for each allocated function.
低地球轨道以外空间行动中人- agent团队的初步准则
本文提出了低地球轨道以外空间任务中人-agent团队功能分配的初步准则。当前的低轨道空间任务是由宇航员和任务控制中心之间的实时协作来支持的,以处理任何非名义情况。对于低轨道以外的空间任务,地面任务控制中心和宇航员之间的通信延迟将限制任务控制中心在非名义情况下提供的指导,在这种情况下没有程序存在。这将要求空间工作人员在决策过程中必须在没有任务控制实时支持的情况下发现、诊断和产生替代解决办法。以前的经验和对宇航员的训练可能没有预料到每一种情况。新程序的产生或对现有程序的修改将是一项非常具有挑战性和耗时的任务。因此,低轨道以外的任务将越来越依赖智能自动化能力来支持宇航员的实时决策。在之前的工作中,作者生成了领域知识模型,描述了设计需求,并确定了未来操作的可能概念。本文将低轨道任务的决策-行动图(Decision-Action Diagram, DAD)外推到低轨道以外的任务。该DAD描述了在非名义情况下LEO以外任务的协作决策过程。通过对近地轨道外任务和当前近地轨道任务的DAD进行比较,可以看出任务控制的部分功能将分配给航天器中乘员的认知助理(CA)(智能自动化)。为了正确分配功能,描述了初步指导方针,以确定:(a)哪些功能可能分配给人或代理,(b)确定何时动态分配功能的当前情况的潜在触发因素,以及(c) CA对每个分配功能的自动化逻辑级别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信