How much data should we collect? A case study in sepsis detection using deep learning

F. van Wyk, Anahita Khojandi, R. Kamaleswaran, O. Akbilgic, S. Nemati, R. Davis
{"title":"How much data should we collect? A case study in sepsis detection using deep learning","authors":"F. van Wyk, Anahita Khojandi, R. Kamaleswaran, O. Akbilgic, S. Nemati, R. Davis","doi":"10.1109/HIC.2017.8227596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sepsis is an acute, life-threatening condition that results from bacterial infections, often acquired in the hospital. Undetected, sepsis can progress to severe sepsis and septic shock, with a risk of death as high as 30% to 80%. Early detection of sepsis can improve patient outcomes. Collecting and evaluating continuous physiological variables, such as vital signs, using sophisticated classification algorithms may be highly beneficial to aid diagnosis of septic patients. However, setting up a data acquisition system that can collect (and store) high frequency/high volume data is challenging both from technology management and storage standpoints. In this paper, we build two deep learning models, a convolutional neural network and a multilayer perceptron model, to classify patients into sepsis and non-sepsis groups using data collected at various frequencies from the first 12 hours after admission. Our results indicate that the convolutional neural network model outperforms the multilayer perceptron model for all data collection frequencies. In addition, our results put into perspective the value of data collection frequency and translate its value into lives saved. Such analysis can guide future investments in data acquisition systems by hospitals.","PeriodicalId":120815,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Healthcare Innovations and Point of Care Technologies (HI-POCT)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Healthcare Innovations and Point of Care Technologies (HI-POCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIC.2017.8227596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Sepsis is an acute, life-threatening condition that results from bacterial infections, often acquired in the hospital. Undetected, sepsis can progress to severe sepsis and septic shock, with a risk of death as high as 30% to 80%. Early detection of sepsis can improve patient outcomes. Collecting and evaluating continuous physiological variables, such as vital signs, using sophisticated classification algorithms may be highly beneficial to aid diagnosis of septic patients. However, setting up a data acquisition system that can collect (and store) high frequency/high volume data is challenging both from technology management and storage standpoints. In this paper, we build two deep learning models, a convolutional neural network and a multilayer perceptron model, to classify patients into sepsis and non-sepsis groups using data collected at various frequencies from the first 12 hours after admission. Our results indicate that the convolutional neural network model outperforms the multilayer perceptron model for all data collection frequencies. In addition, our results put into perspective the value of data collection frequency and translate its value into lives saved. Such analysis can guide future investments in data acquisition systems by hospitals.
我们应该收集多少数据?利用深度学习进行败血症检测的案例研究
败血症是一种由细菌感染引起的急性、危及生命的疾病,通常是在医院获得的。在未被发现的情况下,败血症可发展为严重败血症和感染性休克,死亡风险高达30%至80%。早期发现败血症可以改善患者的预后。使用复杂的分类算法收集和评估连续的生理变量,如生命体征,可能对脓毒症患者的诊断非常有益。然而,从技术管理和存储的角度来看,建立一个可以收集(和存储)高频/大容量数据的数据采集系统是一个挑战。在本文中,我们建立了两个深度学习模型,一个卷积神经网络和一个多层感知器模型,使用入院后12小时内不同频率收集的数据将患者分为脓毒症和非脓毒症组。我们的研究结果表明,卷积神经网络模型在所有数据采集频率下都优于多层感知器模型。此外,我们的研究结果将数据收集频率的价值转化为挽救生命的价值。这种分析可以指导医院未来对数据采集系统的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信