Sustaining Public-Private Partnerships

G. Shambaugh, R. Matthew
{"title":"Sustaining Public-Private Partnerships","authors":"G. Shambaugh, R. Matthew","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2658197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public-private partnerships provide great opportunities for managing particular types of issues. In situations where the quality, quantity and price of the good or services being provided continue to increase over time, they are likely to be highly effective. While it is important that agreements be structured in ways that maintain competition and protect firms from renationalization for profit, such agreements are generally sustainable and beneficial for all parties. This success cannot, however, be generalized to all types of PPPs. When improvements in the quality or quantity of a good or service are limited, then private sector partners run the risk of obsolescence bargaining and are prone to generating over-priced and elite-focused consumer products. When minimal levels of a good or service must be provided and prices are constrained, then the government runs the risk of private sector partners underproviding the quality or quantity, in turn leaving the government stuck with providing side payments, subsidization or renationalization. Worst of all, perhaps, is the situation of environmental goods and other services that are valued for their existence benefits. In such circumstances, both the private and public partners have an incentive to underprovide the resource because their constituents or customers will continue to pay for the good or service over time. Indeed, these constituents will pay more over time if the good or service is underprovided.Caveat Emptor: The benefits and risks of public private partnerships will shift among the private sector partner, the public sector partner, and the public at large depending on changes in price and value over time. Public private partnerships work best for services that are commercially viable. They work less well when providing social or environmental goods. When existence benefits are at stake, PPPs are at their worst. In such circumstances, PPPs will likely continue to provide benefits their public and private partners while underserving the public at large.","PeriodicalId":241506,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Partnership Form (Topic)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Partnership Form (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2658197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Public-private partnerships provide great opportunities for managing particular types of issues. In situations where the quality, quantity and price of the good or services being provided continue to increase over time, they are likely to be highly effective. While it is important that agreements be structured in ways that maintain competition and protect firms from renationalization for profit, such agreements are generally sustainable and beneficial for all parties. This success cannot, however, be generalized to all types of PPPs. When improvements in the quality or quantity of a good or service are limited, then private sector partners run the risk of obsolescence bargaining and are prone to generating over-priced and elite-focused consumer products. When minimal levels of a good or service must be provided and prices are constrained, then the government runs the risk of private sector partners underproviding the quality or quantity, in turn leaving the government stuck with providing side payments, subsidization or renationalization. Worst of all, perhaps, is the situation of environmental goods and other services that are valued for their existence benefits. In such circumstances, both the private and public partners have an incentive to underprovide the resource because their constituents or customers will continue to pay for the good or service over time. Indeed, these constituents will pay more over time if the good or service is underprovided.Caveat Emptor: The benefits and risks of public private partnerships will shift among the private sector partner, the public sector partner, and the public at large depending on changes in price and value over time. Public private partnerships work best for services that are commercially viable. They work less well when providing social or environmental goods. When existence benefits are at stake, PPPs are at their worst. In such circumstances, PPPs will likely continue to provide benefits their public and private partners while underserving the public at large.
维持公私伙伴关系
公私伙伴关系为管理特定类型的问题提供了巨大的机会。如果所提供的商品或服务的质量、数量和价格随着时间的推移而不断增加,它们可能是非常有效的。虽然重要的是,协议的结构必须保持竞争和保护公司不为利润而重新国有化,但这种协议一般是可持续的,对所有各方都有利。然而,这种成功不能推广到所有类型的ppp。当一种商品或服务在质量或数量上的改进受到限制时,私营部门的合作伙伴就会面临讨价还价过时的风险,并容易生产出价格过高、以精英为中心的消费产品。当必须提供最低限度的商品或服务且价格受到限制时,政府就会面临私营部门合作伙伴提供质量或数量不足的风险,从而使政府陷入提供附加支付、补贴或重新国有化的困境。也许最糟糕的是环境产品和其他服务的情况,它们因其存在的利益而受到重视。在这种情况下,私营和公共合作伙伴都有动机提供不足的资源,因为随着时间的推移,他们的选民或客户将继续为商品或服务付费。事实上,随着时间的推移,如果商品或服务供应不足,这些选民将支付更多的钱。购者自负:公私合作伙伴关系的收益和风险将根据价格和价值的变化在私营部门合作伙伴、公共部门合作伙伴和广大公众之间发生变化。公私伙伴关系对商业上可行的服务最有效。在提供社会或环境产品时,它们的效果就不那么好了。当存在的利益受到威胁时,ppp是最糟糕的。在这种情况下,公私合作伙伴关系可能会继续为其公共和私营合作伙伴提供利益,而总体上对公众服务不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信