Glocal identification methods for low-order lumped parameter thermal networks used in permanent magnet synchronous motors

Daniel E. Gaona, O. Wallscheid, J. Böcker
{"title":"Glocal identification methods for low-order lumped parameter thermal networks used in permanent magnet synchronous motors","authors":"Daniel E. Gaona, O. Wallscheid, J. Böcker","doi":"10.1109/PEDS.2017.8289163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High utilization of permanent magnet machines without monitoring their internal temperatures has negative impact on windings and permanent magnets. Lumped-parameter thermal networks (LPTNs) are therefore used to estimate magnet and winding temperatures. LPTNs identification is an intricate process as LPTNs can only be accurately described as linear-parameter varying systems (LPV). Thus specialized identification techniques are required such as global and local methods studied in the last decades. This paper studies the performance of the so-called glocal methods. Hence, SMILE, H2-norm, and H∞-norm methods are implemented and compared. All three glocal methods are able to represent the system with high accuracy. H2-norm and ∞-norm methods achieve slightly better accuracy than SMILE; however, complications such as computational burden and local minimum convergence favor SMILE. The latter has a faster convergence and can achieve high accuracy with maximum temperature estimations errors of 6.8 °C, 6.2 °C, and 4.7 °C for the winding, end-winding, and permanent magnets. Finally, it was found that the model accuracy does not improve majorly by increasing the number of local models. It was estimated that a segmentation of the operating range (speed and current) into 4 or 5 parts respectively is enough to obtain a relative accurate LPV.","PeriodicalId":411916,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDS.2017.8289163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

High utilization of permanent magnet machines without monitoring their internal temperatures has negative impact on windings and permanent magnets. Lumped-parameter thermal networks (LPTNs) are therefore used to estimate magnet and winding temperatures. LPTNs identification is an intricate process as LPTNs can only be accurately described as linear-parameter varying systems (LPV). Thus specialized identification techniques are required such as global and local methods studied in the last decades. This paper studies the performance of the so-called glocal methods. Hence, SMILE, H2-norm, and H∞-norm methods are implemented and compared. All three glocal methods are able to represent the system with high accuracy. H2-norm and ∞-norm methods achieve slightly better accuracy than SMILE; however, complications such as computational burden and local minimum convergence favor SMILE. The latter has a faster convergence and can achieve high accuracy with maximum temperature estimations errors of 6.8 °C, 6.2 °C, and 4.7 °C for the winding, end-winding, and permanent magnets. Finally, it was found that the model accuracy does not improve majorly by increasing the number of local models. It was estimated that a segmentation of the operating range (speed and current) into 4 or 5 parts respectively is enough to obtain a relative accurate LPV.
永磁同步电机低阶集总参数热网络的全局局部辨识方法
在不监测其内部温度的情况下,永磁电机的高利用率对绕组和永磁体产生了负面影响。集总参数热网络(lptn)因此被用来估计磁体和绕组的温度。lptn的识别是一个复杂的过程,因为lptn只能准确地描述为线性参数变系统(LPV)。因此,需要专门的识别技术,例如过去几十年研究的全球和局部方法。本文研究了所谓的全局局部方法的性能。因此,对SMILE、H2-norm和H∞-norm方法进行了实现和比较。这三种方法都能以较高的精度表示系统。h2 -范数和∞-范数方法的准确率略好于SMILE;然而,计算负担和局部最小收敛等复杂性有利于SMILE。后者具有更快的收敛速度,可以实现高精度,绕组,端绕组和永磁体的最大温度估计误差为6.8°C, 6.2°C和4.7°C。最后发现,增加局部模型的数量并不能显著提高模型的精度。据估计,将工作范围(速度和电流)分别分割为4或5部分足以获得相对准确的LPV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信