VOR Cancellation at the patient's bedside: how to avoid another cause of false positive

Ricardo D’Albora – Rivas, José Luis Cuervo, Ligia Silvera, María Julia Monaco – Hansen, Guilermo Zalazar, S. Carmona
{"title":"VOR Cancellation at the patient's bedside: how to avoid another cause of false positive","authors":"Ricardo D’Albora – Rivas, José Luis Cuervo, Ligia Silvera, María Julia Monaco – Hansen, Guilermo Zalazar, S. Carmona","doi":"10.15406/joentr.2023.15.00519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is little literature on the semiological aspects of the clinical Vestibulo-Occulomotor Reflex (VOR) cancellation technique. This study aims to determine which would be the best head movement frequency cutoff to perform the VOR cancellation clinical test. Materials and methods: 98 horizontal semicircular canals with normal gains from normal individuals were included. The VOR was cancelled by placing a headband with a fixed target over the individual's head, and the patient was told to keep their eyes on the target while the examiner recorded the presence and number of saccades that were evident with the naked eye by performing sinusoidal cephalic rotations at different frequencies. The head rotation frequency was compared with the following variables: 1-Saccades that are evident with the naked eye -SHIMP (+) clinical-, 2-The presence of saccades performed for a period of 2 seconds, 3- The presence of saccades performed in every cycle, 4- Amplitude in º/sec. of the performed saccades, 5-Percentage of VOR cancellation and 6-Age. Conclusion: To avoid a false positive caused by SHIMP saccades during the clinical evaluation of the VOR cancellation at the patient's bedside, we recommend performing cephalic rotations with frequencies lower than 0.5Hz - 0.6Hz for the age group under 67 years old. In patients older than and equal to 67 years old, the interpretation of the VOR cancellation using this method should be cautious, and it should be performed with glasses if worn. Keywords: vestibulo-cular reflex cancellation, SHIMP saccades, SHIMP headband","PeriodicalId":316775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT Research","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/joentr.2023.15.00519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is little literature on the semiological aspects of the clinical Vestibulo-Occulomotor Reflex (VOR) cancellation technique. This study aims to determine which would be the best head movement frequency cutoff to perform the VOR cancellation clinical test. Materials and methods: 98 horizontal semicircular canals with normal gains from normal individuals were included. The VOR was cancelled by placing a headband with a fixed target over the individual's head, and the patient was told to keep their eyes on the target while the examiner recorded the presence and number of saccades that were evident with the naked eye by performing sinusoidal cephalic rotations at different frequencies. The head rotation frequency was compared with the following variables: 1-Saccades that are evident with the naked eye -SHIMP (+) clinical-, 2-The presence of saccades performed for a period of 2 seconds, 3- The presence of saccades performed in every cycle, 4- Amplitude in º/sec. of the performed saccades, 5-Percentage of VOR cancellation and 6-Age. Conclusion: To avoid a false positive caused by SHIMP saccades during the clinical evaluation of the VOR cancellation at the patient's bedside, we recommend performing cephalic rotations with frequencies lower than 0.5Hz - 0.6Hz for the age group under 67 years old. In patients older than and equal to 67 years old, the interpretation of the VOR cancellation using this method should be cautious, and it should be performed with glasses if worn. Keywords: vestibulo-cular reflex cancellation, SHIMP saccades, SHIMP headband
在病人床边取消VOR:如何避免假阳性的另一个原因
关于临床前庭-眼运动反射(VOR)消除技术的符号学方面的文献很少。本研究旨在确定进行VOR取消临床试验的最佳头部运动频率截止点。材料和方法:98个正常个体的水平半规管。通过在个体头上放置固定目标的头带来取消VOR,并且告知患者保持眼睛盯着目标,而审查员通过以不同频率进行正弦头旋转来记录肉眼可见的扫视的存在和次数。将头部旋转频率与以下变量进行比较:1-肉眼可见的扫视- shimp(+)临床-,2-持续2秒的扫视,3-每个周期的扫视,4-幅度(º/秒)。完成的眼跳,5- VOR取消的百分比和6-Age。结论:为了避免在患者床边对VOR取消进行临床评估时因SHIMP扫视引起的假阳性,我们建议对67岁以下的患者进行频率低于0.5Hz - 0.6Hz的头侧旋转。在年龄大于等于67岁的患者中,使用这种方法解释VOR取消应谨慎,如果佩戴眼镜应进行解释。关键词:前庭反射消除,SHIMP扫视,SHIMP头带
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信