Do RSSI values reliably map to RSS in a localization system?

Daniel Konings, Nathaniel Faulkner, F. Alam, Frazer K. Noble, E. Lai
{"title":"Do RSSI values reliably map to RSS in a localization system?","authors":"Daniel Konings, Nathaniel Faulkner, F. Alam, Frazer K. Noble, E. Lai","doi":"10.1109/RTTR.2017.7887867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, research into localization systems has become more popular as the proliferation of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) grows. Wireless Localization can refer to either an “Active” system which tracks a mobile transceiver, or “Passive” localization which tracks a transceiver free entity by measuring the changes it makes to the surrounding wireless environment. Recent work has seen both of these systems implemented with Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) values from transceivers. Many algorithms and channel models have been presented to increase the accuracy of a Received Signal Strength (RSS) based system. In this paper we experimentally check whether RSSI values map to the expected RSS values within an IEEE 802.15.4 network. Indoor experiments are repeated within an ideal outdoor environment, with multiple device platforms, to eliminate indoor multipath propagation as the cause for inconsistent behavior of RSSI. We identify 3 key issues with raw RSSI values and present either a possible solution or a mitigation strategy to reduce their effect. We conclude that using raw RSSI values is flawed, as the premise that they uniquely map to the distance between transceivers is incorrect. However they may be calibrated to increase their accuracy, and therefore viability.","PeriodicalId":339960,"journal":{"name":"2017 2nd Workshop on Recent Trends in Telecommunications Research (RTTR)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 2nd Workshop on Recent Trends in Telecommunications Research (RTTR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTTR.2017.7887867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

In recent years, research into localization systems has become more popular as the proliferation of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) grows. Wireless Localization can refer to either an “Active” system which tracks a mobile transceiver, or “Passive” localization which tracks a transceiver free entity by measuring the changes it makes to the surrounding wireless environment. Recent work has seen both of these systems implemented with Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) values from transceivers. Many algorithms and channel models have been presented to increase the accuracy of a Received Signal Strength (RSS) based system. In this paper we experimentally check whether RSSI values map to the expected RSS values within an IEEE 802.15.4 network. Indoor experiments are repeated within an ideal outdoor environment, with multiple device platforms, to eliminate indoor multipath propagation as the cause for inconsistent behavior of RSSI. We identify 3 key issues with raw RSSI values and present either a possible solution or a mitigation strategy to reduce their effect. We conclude that using raw RSSI values is flawed, as the premise that they uniquely map to the distance between transceivers is incorrect. However they may be calibrated to increase their accuracy, and therefore viability.
在定位系统中,RSSI值是否可靠地映射到RSS ?
近年来,随着无线传感器网络(WSNs)的蓬勃发展,对定位系统的研究变得越来越流行。无线定位既可以指跟踪移动收发器的“主动”系统,也可以指通过测量收发器对周围无线环境的变化来跟踪无收发器实体的“被动”定位。最近的工作已经看到这两个系统都实现了接收信号强度指示(RSSI)值从收发器。为了提高基于接收信号强度(RSS)的系统的精度,提出了许多算法和信道模型。在本文中,我们通过实验检查RSSI值是否映射到IEEE 802.15.4网络中的预期RSS值。在理想的室外环境中,使用多个设备平台重复室内实验,以消除室内多径传播导致RSSI行为不一致的原因。我们确定了原始RSSI值的3个关键问题,并提出了可能的解决方案或缓解策略,以减少其影响。我们得出的结论是,使用原始RSSI值是有缺陷的,因为它们唯一映射到收发器之间的距离的前提是不正确的。然而,它们可能被校准以增加其准确性,从而提高可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信