An Empirical Study of the Key Profitability Factors of Interest-free Banking vs. Conventional Banking in the MENA Region Following the 2008 Financial Crisis

Mariam Bouarich
{"title":"An Empirical Study of the Key Profitability Factors of Interest-free Banking vs. Conventional Banking in the MENA Region Following the 2008 Financial Crisis","authors":"Mariam Bouarich","doi":"10.47260/jafb/1366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n\nThe stability of any economy is closely tied to the stability of its banking sector, necessitating continuous evaluation and efficiency enhancement. The recent emergence of Interest-free banking in the MENA region and globally has seen rapid growth, attracting global interest. However, limited research has compared the financial performance of this new type of banking with conventional banks, particularly in the MENA region. To address this gap, this study aims to measure and compare the financial performance of 55 conventional banks and 26 interest-free banks across the MENA region from 2008 to 2014, using the CAMELS rating system. Descriptive statistics will be employed to analyze time series data, followed by the One-Way ANOVA analysis to identify significant differences between the two banking systems. Pearson’s correlation coefficient will be used to assess correlations among independent variables and test for multi-collinearity problems. Ultimately, the fixed-effects model will determine how internal factors like capital adequacy, asset quality, management quality, earnings quality, and liquidity impact the financial performance of both banking system types in the MENA region. The study's findings reveal that asset quality, earnings quality, and liquidity are the key drivers of profitability for both interest-free and conventional banks in the MENA region.\n\nKeywords: Interest-free banking, Conventional banking, CAMELS rating system, MENA Region, Financial institutions, Financial intermediaries, Financial crisis.","PeriodicalId":330012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Finance & Banking","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Finance & Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47260/jafb/1366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The stability of any economy is closely tied to the stability of its banking sector, necessitating continuous evaluation and efficiency enhancement. The recent emergence of Interest-free banking in the MENA region and globally has seen rapid growth, attracting global interest. However, limited research has compared the financial performance of this new type of banking with conventional banks, particularly in the MENA region. To address this gap, this study aims to measure and compare the financial performance of 55 conventional banks and 26 interest-free banks across the MENA region from 2008 to 2014, using the CAMELS rating system. Descriptive statistics will be employed to analyze time series data, followed by the One-Way ANOVA analysis to identify significant differences between the two banking systems. Pearson’s correlation coefficient will be used to assess correlations among independent variables and test for multi-collinearity problems. Ultimately, the fixed-effects model will determine how internal factors like capital adequacy, asset quality, management quality, earnings quality, and liquidity impact the financial performance of both banking system types in the MENA region. The study's findings reveal that asset quality, earnings quality, and liquidity are the key drivers of profitability for both interest-free and conventional banks in the MENA region. Keywords: Interest-free banking, Conventional banking, CAMELS rating system, MENA Region, Financial institutions, Financial intermediaries, Financial crisis.
2008年金融危机后中东和北非地区无息银行与传统银行关键盈利能力因素的实证研究
摘要任何经济体的稳定都与其银行业的稳定密切相关,因此需要不断评估和提高效率。最近在中东和北非地区和全球范围内出现的无息银行业务迅速增长,吸引了全球的兴趣。然而,将这种新型银行的财务绩效与传统银行进行比较的研究有限,特别是在中东和北非地区。为了解决这一差距,本研究旨在利用camel评级系统,衡量和比较2008年至2014年中东和北非地区55家传统银行和26家无息银行的财务绩效。描述性统计将用于分析时间序列数据,其次是单向方差分析,以确定两个银行系统之间的显著差异。皮尔逊相关系数将用于评估自变量之间的相关性和检验多重共线性问题。最终,固定效应模型将确定资本充足率、资产质量、管理质量、盈余质量和流动性等内部因素如何影响中东和北非地区两种银行体系类型的财务绩效。研究结果显示,资产质量、盈利质量和流动性是中东和北非地区无息银行和传统银行盈利能力的关键驱动因素。关键词:无息银行,传统银行,camel评级体系,中东和北非地区,金融机构,金融中介机构,金融危机
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信