Of Sustainable Development in Africa: Addressing the (In)Congruence of Plastic Bag Regulations with International Trade Rules

Regis Yann Simo
{"title":"Of Sustainable Development in Africa: Addressing the (In)Congruence of Plastic Bag Regulations with International Trade Rules","authors":"Regis Yann Simo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3391826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several aspects of the trade policies of African countries suffer from neglect in the legal literature. When they are the object of research, the focus is sometimes limited to their participation in the dispute settlement system or on the enforceability of special and differential treatment provisions. While practice displays that African countries have almost never been the target of complaints for a number a reasons, those approaches do not always take into consideration African countries’ domestic measures affecting the flow of goods and services, which could eventually trigger disputes. This paper, which intends to fill that gap and add to the existing stream of research, tackles trade measures geared toward sustainable development and environmental protection in Africa, especially the growing body of legislation to restrict the use plastic bags. The multilateral trading rules give the Members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) flexibility to pursue social and environmental policies provided the latter are compliant with the provisions of the covered agreements. While some African countries that have taken the steps to address plastic bags have either made use of quantitative restrictions or licencing schemes, others have combined these border measures with domestic regulations. Coming from all parts of the continent, and all being WTO Members, this is their contribution to the debate on sustainable development goals spelled out in the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the WTO. The paper reviews these countries’ regulations, not only individually but also in the framework of regional economic integration schemes in which they are parties, in search of their compatibility with the multilateral trade rules.","PeriodicalId":157380,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Anthropology eJournal","volume":"04 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Anthropology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3391826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Several aspects of the trade policies of African countries suffer from neglect in the legal literature. When they are the object of research, the focus is sometimes limited to their participation in the dispute settlement system or on the enforceability of special and differential treatment provisions. While practice displays that African countries have almost never been the target of complaints for a number a reasons, those approaches do not always take into consideration African countries’ domestic measures affecting the flow of goods and services, which could eventually trigger disputes. This paper, which intends to fill that gap and add to the existing stream of research, tackles trade measures geared toward sustainable development and environmental protection in Africa, especially the growing body of legislation to restrict the use plastic bags. The multilateral trading rules give the Members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) flexibility to pursue social and environmental policies provided the latter are compliant with the provisions of the covered agreements. While some African countries that have taken the steps to address plastic bags have either made use of quantitative restrictions or licencing schemes, others have combined these border measures with domestic regulations. Coming from all parts of the continent, and all being WTO Members, this is their contribution to the debate on sustainable development goals spelled out in the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the WTO. The paper reviews these countries’ regulations, not only individually but also in the framework of regional economic integration schemes in which they are parties, in search of their compatibility with the multilateral trade rules.
非洲可持续发展:解决塑料袋法规与国际贸易规则的一致性问题
非洲国家贸易政策的几个方面在法律文献中受到忽视。当它们成为研究对象时,重点有时限于它们对解决争端制度的参与或特殊和差别待遇规定的可执行性。虽然实践表明,由于许多原因,非洲国家几乎从来没有成为申诉的对象,但这些办法并不总是考虑到非洲国家影响货物和服务流动的国内措施,这些措施最终可能引发争端。本文旨在填补这一空白,并增加现有的研究流,探讨面向非洲可持续发展和环境保护的贸易措施,特别是越来越多的限制使用塑料袋的立法。多边贸易规则使世界贸易组织(贸易组织)成员在推行社会和环境政策方面具有灵活性,只要这些政策符合有关协定的规定。一些已经采取措施解决塑料袋问题的非洲国家要么采用数量限制措施,要么采用许可证制度,而其他一些国家则将这些边境措施与国内法规结合起来。他们来自非洲大陆的各个地区,都是世贸组织成员,这是他们对《马拉喀什建立世贸组织协定》中阐明的可持续发展目标的辩论的贡献。本文不仅单独审查了这些国家的条例,而且还在它们作为缔约方的区域经济一体化计划的框架内审查了这些条例,以寻求它们与多边贸易规则的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信