Urgency of Consumer Legal Protection and E-Commerce Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration in the Asian Market

Derry Angling Kesuma, Yuli Asmara Triputra
{"title":"Urgency of Consumer Legal Protection and E-Commerce Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration in the Asian Market","authors":"Derry Angling Kesuma, Yuli Asmara Triputra","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.201209.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growth of the e-commerce industry in Asia in general, and in Indonesia in particular is growing rapidly in the midst of trade flows that are increasingly rapidly advancing. The very rapid development of information technology has given rise to a new style in the trading system, and also the process of dispute resolution must also follow existing developments. The change in the way transactions in the business world from the real world to the virtual world, has given birth to a variety of new legal problems for consumers in e-commerce, where consumers often do not have a strong bargaining position and put consumers in a weak position. By using the normative juridical approach method and analytical descriptive nature, the results of the study show that the protection of consumers in trade transactions through electronic systems cannot be optimally carried out because the regulations are still scattered in several laws that require implementing regulations. In addition, Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection has not been able to reach consumer protection in electronic trade transactions as a whole, especially in the case of parties having different jurisdictions. Whereas in the case of consumer disputes, the parties can take the court or outside the court by using ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) according to the agreement of the parties, where the methods used in ADR have been agreed upon first.","PeriodicalId":346556,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The growth of the e-commerce industry in Asia in general, and in Indonesia in particular is growing rapidly in the midst of trade flows that are increasingly rapidly advancing. The very rapid development of information technology has given rise to a new style in the trading system, and also the process of dispute resolution must also follow existing developments. The change in the way transactions in the business world from the real world to the virtual world, has given birth to a variety of new legal problems for consumers in e-commerce, where consumers often do not have a strong bargaining position and put consumers in a weak position. By using the normative juridical approach method and analytical descriptive nature, the results of the study show that the protection of consumers in trade transactions through electronic systems cannot be optimally carried out because the regulations are still scattered in several laws that require implementing regulations. In addition, Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection has not been able to reach consumer protection in electronic trade transactions as a whole, especially in the case of parties having different jurisdictions. Whereas in the case of consumer disputes, the parties can take the court or outside the court by using ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) according to the agreement of the parties, where the methods used in ADR have been agreed upon first.
亚洲市场消费者法律保护与电子商务仲裁争议解决的紧迫性
整个亚洲的电子商务行业,特别是印度尼西亚的电子商务行业,在日益快速推进的贸易流动中增长迅速。信息技术的飞速发展催生了贸易制度的新风格,争端解决的过程也必须遵循现有的发展。商业世界的交易方式从现实世界向虚拟世界的转变,给电子商务中的消费者带来了各种新的法律问题,消费者往往没有很强的议价地位,使消费者处于弱势地位。通过运用规范的司法方法和分析描述性的方法,研究结果表明,由于法规仍然分散在几个需要实施法规的法律中,因此无法最优地实施电子系统贸易交易中的消费者保护。此外,1999年关于消费者保护的第8号法未能在整个电子贸易交易中实现对消费者的保护,特别是在当事人拥有不同管辖权的情况下。而在消费者纠纷的情况下,当事人可以根据当事人的协议,采用ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution,替代性争议解决方式)向法院或法院外诉讼,但ADR的使用方式已事先达成一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信