BPMN Extension Profiles -- Adapting the Profile Mechanism for Integrated BPMN Extensibility

Richard Braun
{"title":"BPMN Extension Profiles -- Adapting the Profile Mechanism for Integrated BPMN Extensibility","authors":"Richard Braun","doi":"10.1109/CBI.2015.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BPMN is one of the most prevalent modeling languages within the field of enterprise modeling and constitutes as de facto standard for business process modeling. BPMN provides explicit capabilities for extending the vocabulary of the language. While a range of BPMN extensions evolved during the last years, only very few of them conduct the extension mechanism. Instead, the vast majority of extensions is designed in an ad-hoc manner and lacks in conformity to the BPMN standard, what hampers interoperability, extension integration and model reuse. We suppose, that some architectural shortcomings and barriers of the extension mechanism itself provoke missing application. For instance, BPMN reveals abstraction conflicts and inaccuracies within the extension design. The extension mechanism also lacks in regard of exactly specifying those elements that are extended. Further, the exchange of both the concrete syntax and serialized extended model data remains vague. We therefore present an adaptation of the well-established profile mechanism from the UML Infrastructure in order to facilitate a straightforward definition of the abstract syntax for BPMN extensions. Additionally, the definition of the concrete syntax is supported by an instantiation of OMG's Diagram Definition (DD) specification in order to provide an integrated extension definition and exchange specification. The migration of existing, standard-conform BPMN extensions is outlined by a transformation process.","PeriodicalId":238097,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 17th Conference on Business Informatics","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 17th Conference on Business Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2015.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

BPMN is one of the most prevalent modeling languages within the field of enterprise modeling and constitutes as de facto standard for business process modeling. BPMN provides explicit capabilities for extending the vocabulary of the language. While a range of BPMN extensions evolved during the last years, only very few of them conduct the extension mechanism. Instead, the vast majority of extensions is designed in an ad-hoc manner and lacks in conformity to the BPMN standard, what hampers interoperability, extension integration and model reuse. We suppose, that some architectural shortcomings and barriers of the extension mechanism itself provoke missing application. For instance, BPMN reveals abstraction conflicts and inaccuracies within the extension design. The extension mechanism also lacks in regard of exactly specifying those elements that are extended. Further, the exchange of both the concrete syntax and serialized extended model data remains vague. We therefore present an adaptation of the well-established profile mechanism from the UML Infrastructure in order to facilitate a straightforward definition of the abstract syntax for BPMN extensions. Additionally, the definition of the concrete syntax is supported by an instantiation of OMG's Diagram Definition (DD) specification in order to provide an integrated extension definition and exchange specification. The migration of existing, standard-conform BPMN extensions is outlined by a transformation process.
BPMN扩展概要文件——为集成的BPMN可扩展性调整概要文件机制
BPMN是企业建模领域中最流行的建模语言之一,并构成了业务流程建模的事实上的标准。BPMN为扩展语言的词汇表提供了显式的功能。虽然一系列BPMN扩展在过去几年中得到了发展,但其中只有极少数执行扩展机制。相反,绝大多数扩展都是以特别的方式设计的,并且缺乏与BPMN标准的一致性,这阻碍了互操作性、扩展集成和模型重用。我们认为,扩展机制本身的一些架构缺陷和障碍导致了应用程序的缺失。例如,BPMN揭示了扩展设计中的抽象冲突和不准确性。扩展机制也缺乏精确指定要扩展的元素。此外,具体语法和序列化的扩展模型数据的交换仍然很模糊。因此,我们提出了对UML基础设施中已建立的概要文件机制的一种改编,以促进对BPMN扩展的抽象语法的直接定义。此外,具体语法的定义由OMG的图表定义(DD)规范的实例化来支持,以便提供集成的扩展定义和交换规范。现有的、符合标准的BPMN扩展的迁移由转换过程概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信