Recruitment practices under scrutiny: A latent-profile analysis of family firms’ approaches to recruit non-family employees

Rouven Kollitz, S. Ruhle, Stefan Süß
{"title":"Recruitment practices under scrutiny: A latent-profile analysis of family firms’ approaches to recruit non-family employees","authors":"Rouven Kollitz, S. Ruhle, Stefan Süß","doi":"10.1177/2397002219831502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recruitment of qualified non-family employees is a challenge for many family firms. Job seekers from outside may be wary of the family firm employment practice and the family themselves may have an informal approach to finding employees which often relies on word of mouth and produces a limited pool of talent. In this study we investigate adopted recruitment practices and the factors behind recruiting non-family workforce as we seek common elements, explanations and outcomes. Applying latent-profile analysis to the recruiting practices of 259 family firms we explore sets of adopted recruitment practices, their respective predictors, including socioemotional wealth, and potential outcomes. These analyses reveal five latent classes: (1) reduced recruitment; (2) online high cost recruitment; (3) full scope recruitment; (4) offline informal recruitment; and (5) formal high cost recruitment. In sum, our findings suggest that substantial differences in family firms’ approaches to recruitment exist, providing further evidence for the heterogeneity of family firms. Finally, findings are discussed with regard to limitations and implications for future research.","PeriodicalId":206271,"journal":{"name":"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002219831502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Recruitment of qualified non-family employees is a challenge for many family firms. Job seekers from outside may be wary of the family firm employment practice and the family themselves may have an informal approach to finding employees which often relies on word of mouth and produces a limited pool of talent. In this study we investigate adopted recruitment practices and the factors behind recruiting non-family workforce as we seek common elements, explanations and outcomes. Applying latent-profile analysis to the recruiting practices of 259 family firms we explore sets of adopted recruitment practices, their respective predictors, including socioemotional wealth, and potential outcomes. These analyses reveal five latent classes: (1) reduced recruitment; (2) online high cost recruitment; (3) full scope recruitment; (4) offline informal recruitment; and (5) formal high cost recruitment. In sum, our findings suggest that substantial differences in family firms’ approaches to recruitment exist, providing further evidence for the heterogeneity of family firms. Finally, findings are discussed with regard to limitations and implications for future research.
审视下的招聘实践:对家族企业招聘非家族员工方式的潜在剖析
对于许多家族企业来说,招聘合格的非家族员工是一个挑战。外部的求职者可能会对家族企业的招聘做法持谨慎态度,而家族本身可能会采取一种非正式的方式来寻找员工,这种方式往往依赖于口口相传,产生的人才数量有限。在这项研究中,我们调查了采用的招聘实践和招聘非家庭劳动力背后的因素,因为我们寻求共同的因素,解释和结果。通过对259家家族企业招聘实践的潜在概况分析,我们探索了一系列被采用的招聘实践、各自的预测因素,包括社会情感财富和潜在结果。这些分析揭示了五个潜在的类别:(1)招聘减少;(2)在线高成本招聘;(3)全面招聘;(4)线下非正式招聘;(5)正规的高成本招聘。总之,我们的研究结果表明,家族企业的招聘方式存在实质性差异,为家族企业的异质性提供了进一步的证据。最后,讨论了研究结果的局限性和对未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信