Classroom Teacher’s Digital Literacy Level based on Instant Digital Competence Assessment (IDCA) Perspective

I. R. W. Atmojo, R. Ardiansyah, Wulandari Wulandari
{"title":"Classroom Teacher’s Digital Literacy Level based on Instant Digital Competence Assessment (IDCA) Perspective","authors":"I. R. W. Atmojo, R. Ardiansyah, Wulandari Wulandari","doi":"10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i3.51957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological developments have made digital literacy one of the survival skills in the 21st century, which is linked to development of teacher core competencies, and digital literacy. This study aims to evaluate the level of digital literacy among teachers in the classroom. This descriptive qualitative case study involved 6 teachers at elementary school in Surakarta as the subjects which were chosen through purposive sampling by using digital literacy framework based on the Instant Digital Competence Assessment (IDCA) perspective. It classifies digital literacy into three dimensions, namely technology, cognitive, and ethics. The results showed that, on the technology dimension, 16.67% of the subjects were in the medium category, 50% in the low category, and 33% in the very low category. On the cognitive dimension, 33.33% of the subjects were in the moderate category, 16.67% in the low category, and 50% in the very low category. On the ethical dimension, 50% of the subjects were in the high category, 16.67% in the low category, and 33.33% in the very low category. Thus, it has been concluded that the digital literacy level of classroom teachers is in the very low to high categories.","PeriodicalId":236584,"journal":{"name":"Mimbar Sekolah Dasar","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mimbar Sekolah Dasar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i3.51957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Technological developments have made digital literacy one of the survival skills in the 21st century, which is linked to development of teacher core competencies, and digital literacy. This study aims to evaluate the level of digital literacy among teachers in the classroom. This descriptive qualitative case study involved 6 teachers at elementary school in Surakarta as the subjects which were chosen through purposive sampling by using digital literacy framework based on the Instant Digital Competence Assessment (IDCA) perspective. It classifies digital literacy into three dimensions, namely technology, cognitive, and ethics. The results showed that, on the technology dimension, 16.67% of the subjects were in the medium category, 50% in the low category, and 33% in the very low category. On the cognitive dimension, 33.33% of the subjects were in the moderate category, 16.67% in the low category, and 50% in the very low category. On the ethical dimension, 50% of the subjects were in the high category, 16.67% in the low category, and 33.33% in the very low category. Thus, it has been concluded that the digital literacy level of classroom teachers is in the very low to high categories.
基于即时数字能力评估(IDCA)的课堂教师数字素养水平
技术发展使数字素养成为21世纪的生存技能之一,这与教师核心能力和数字素养的发展息息相关。本研究旨在评估教师在课堂上的数位素养水平。本描述性定性个案研究以泗水市6名小学教师为研究对象,采用基于即时数字能力评估(IDCA)视角的数字素养框架进行有目的抽样。它将数字素养分为三个维度,即技术、认知和伦理。结果表明,在技术维度上,16.67%的被试处于中等水平,50%的被试处于低水平,33%的被试处于极低水平。在认知维度上,33.33%的被试处于中等水平,16.67%的被试处于低水平,50%的被试处于极低水平。在道德维度上,50%的被试处于高类别,16.67%的被试处于低类别,33.33%的被试处于极低类别。由此得出结论,课堂教师的数字素养水平处于极低到高的类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信