{"title":"Současné teorie sociálního rozumění na pozadí sporu a antropologickou diferenci","authors":"Filip Jaroš","doi":"10.46938/tv.2018.399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Th is study is inspired by the book Jak rozumíme druhým? Studie o sociálním rozumění a sdílení světa nejen u člověka (How do we understand others? On social understanding and sharing of the world in humans and other animals) by Petr Urban and pays attention to current discussions about social cognition, namely in the case of non-linguistic agents. Most prominent positions are held by the group of comparative psychologists led by M. Tomasello, stemming from the philosophers of collective intentionality, and the group around D. Leavens and K. Bard, which is related to an interactivist interpretation of social cognition. It is demonstrated that the differences in the results of empirical studies are based on the ontological commitments of individual research programs, coupled with their relation to the problem of anthropological difference. The study questions the possibility of choosing a suitable theory by the means of the philosophy of science. At the end, a reinterpretation of non-human social cognition on the basis of umwelt theory is brought out.","PeriodicalId":349992,"journal":{"name":"Teorie vědy / Theory of Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teorie vědy / Theory of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2018.399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Th is study is inspired by the book Jak rozumíme druhým? Studie o sociálním rozumění a sdílení světa nejen u člověka (How do we understand others? On social understanding and sharing of the world in humans and other animals) by Petr Urban and pays attention to current discussions about social cognition, namely in the case of non-linguistic agents. Most prominent positions are held by the group of comparative psychologists led by M. Tomasello, stemming from the philosophers of collective intentionality, and the group around D. Leavens and K. Bard, which is related to an interactivist interpretation of social cognition. It is demonstrated that the differences in the results of empirical studies are based on the ontological commitments of individual research programs, coupled with their relation to the problem of anthropological difference. The study questions the possibility of choosing a suitable theory by the means of the philosophy of science. At the end, a reinterpretation of non-human social cognition on the basis of umwelt theory is brought out.
这项研究的灵感来自于《杰克rozumíme druhým?》研究o sociálním rozumění a sdílení sv ta nejen u lov(我们如何理解他人?关于人类和其他动物对世界的社会理解和分享),并关注当前关于社会认知的讨论,即在非语言代理的情况下。以m·托马塞洛(M. Tomasello)为首的比较心理学家小组,以及以d·利文斯(D. Leavens)和k·巴德(K. Bard)为中心的小组,持有最突出的立场,这一小组与社会认知的互动主义解释有关。实证研究结果的差异是基于个体研究项目的本体论承诺,以及它们与人类学差异问题的关系。本研究对科学哲学选择合适理论的可能性提出了质疑。最后,提出了基于非世界理论对非人类社会认知的重新解释。