CFAR at the end of instrumented range

Y. F. Lok
{"title":"CFAR at the end of instrumented range","authors":"Y. F. Lok","doi":"10.1109/NRC.1999.767332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detection method is commonly used in radar signal processing systems and is described in textbooks. However, there is an implementation problem at the beginning and the end of range samples where data within one of the sliding average windows is missing. The common implementation method is to assume the values in the missing window to be zeroes. That causes the false alarm rate to increase at the two ends of the range samples. The problem is not normally noticeable unless weather clutter exists in those regions. As a result, abnormal false alarm rates will appear as \"weather breakthrough\". In this paper, two approaches are described as solutions to the problem of the common method. The clamped threshold algorithm freezes the last valid threshold and extends it to the range boundary. The second approach allows the sliding window to shrink as it is limited by the range boundary. The two new approaches and the common method are evaluated with real data and simulations. The results indicate that the clamped threshold algorithm is the preferred approach.","PeriodicalId":411890,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Radar Conference. Radar into the Next Millennium (Cat. No.99CH36249)","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Radar Conference. Radar into the Next Millennium (Cat. No.99CH36249)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NRC.1999.767332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detection method is commonly used in radar signal processing systems and is described in textbooks. However, there is an implementation problem at the beginning and the end of range samples where data within one of the sliding average windows is missing. The common implementation method is to assume the values in the missing window to be zeroes. That causes the false alarm rate to increase at the two ends of the range samples. The problem is not normally noticeable unless weather clutter exists in those regions. As a result, abnormal false alarm rates will appear as "weather breakthrough". In this paper, two approaches are described as solutions to the problem of the common method. The clamped threshold algorithm freezes the last valid threshold and extends it to the range boundary. The second approach allows the sliding window to shrink as it is limited by the range boundary. The two new approaches and the common method are evaluated with real data and simulations. The results indicate that the clamped threshold algorithm is the preferred approach.
CFAR在测量范围的末端
恒虚警率(CFAR)检测方法是雷达信号处理系统中常用的检测方法,在教科书中有介绍。然而,在范围样本的开始和结束处存在一个实现问题,其中一个滑动平均窗口内的数据丢失。常见的实现方法是假设缺失窗口中的值为零。这导致了范围样本两端的虚警率增加。除非这些地区存在天气杂波,否则通常不会注意到这个问题。因此,异常的虚警率将出现“天气突破”。本文描述了两种方法作为解决通用方法问题的方法。箝位阈值算法冻结最后一个有效阈值并将其扩展到范围边界。第二种方法允许滑动窗口收缩,因为它受到范围边界的限制。用实际数据和仿真对两种新方法和常用方法进行了评价。结果表明,箝位阈值算法是优选的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信