The validity of the SERVQUAL and SERVPERF scales: A meta‐analytic view of 17 years of research across five continents

François A. Carrillat, Fernando Jaramillo, J. Mulki
{"title":"The validity of the SERVQUAL and SERVPERF scales: A meta‐analytic view of 17 years of research across five continents","authors":"François A. Carrillat, Fernando Jaramillo, J. Mulki","doi":"10.1108/09564230710826250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose is to investigate, the difference between SERVQUAL and SERVPERF's predictive validity of service quality.Design/methodology/approach – Data from 17 studies containing 42 effect sizes of the relationships between SERVQUAL or SERVPERF with overall service quality (OSQ) are meta‐analyzed.Findings – Overall, SERVQUAL and SERVPERF are equally valid predictors of OSQ. Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to the measurement context improves its predictive validity; conversely, the predictive validity of SERVPERF is not improved by context adjustments. In addition, measures of services quality gain predictive validity when used in: less individualistic cultures, non‐English speaking countries, and industries with an intermediate level of customization (hotels, rental cars, or banks).Research limitations/implications – No study, that were using non‐adapted scales were conducted outside of the USA making it impossible to disentangle the impact of scale adaptation vs contextual differences on the modera...","PeriodicalId":102812,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Service Industry Management","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"414","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Service Industry Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230710826250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 414

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose is to investigate, the difference between SERVQUAL and SERVPERF's predictive validity of service quality.Design/methodology/approach – Data from 17 studies containing 42 effect sizes of the relationships between SERVQUAL or SERVPERF with overall service quality (OSQ) are meta‐analyzed.Findings – Overall, SERVQUAL and SERVPERF are equally valid predictors of OSQ. Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to the measurement context improves its predictive validity; conversely, the predictive validity of SERVPERF is not improved by context adjustments. In addition, measures of services quality gain predictive validity when used in: less individualistic cultures, non‐English speaking countries, and industries with an intermediate level of customization (hotels, rental cars, or banks).Research limitations/implications – No study, that were using non‐adapted scales were conducted outside of the USA making it impossible to disentangle the impact of scale adaptation vs contextual differences on the modera...
SERVQUAL和SERVPERF量表的有效性:横跨五大洲17年研究的元分析观点
目的:研究SERVQUAL和SERVPERF对服务质量预测效度的差异。设计/方法/方法-对17项研究的数据进行meta分析,这些研究包含SERVQUAL或SERVPERF与整体服务质量(OSQ)之间关系的42个效应量。研究结果-总体而言,SERVQUAL和SERVPERF是同样有效的OSQ预测因子。SERVQUAL量表适应测量情境,提高了其预测效度;相反,SERVPERF的预测有效性不会因上下文调整而得到改善。此外,服务质量的衡量标准在以下情况下具有预测有效性:个人主义文化较少,非英语国家,以及具有中等定制水平的行业(酒店,租车或银行)。研究局限性/影响-没有在美国以外使用非适应量表的研究,因此不可能理清量表适应与背景差异对现代社会的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信