The International Politics of Climate Engineering: A Review and Prospectus for International Relations

Joshua B. Horton, Jesse L. Reynolds
{"title":"The International Politics of Climate Engineering: A Review and Prospectus for International Relations","authors":"Joshua B. Horton, Jesse L. Reynolds","doi":"10.1093/ISR/VIV013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proposed large-scale intentional interventions in natural systems in order to counter climate change, typically called “climate engineering” or “geoengineering,” stand to dramatically alter the international politics of climate change and potentially much more. There is currently a significant and growing literature on the international politics of climate engineering. However, it has been produced primarily by scholars from outside the discipline of International Relations (IR). We are concerned that IR scholars are missing a critical opportunity to offer insights into, and perhaps help shape, the emerging international politics of climate engineering. To that end, the primary goal of this paper is to call the attention of the IR community to these developments. Thus, we offer here an overview of the existing literature on the international politics of climate engineering and a preliminary assessment of its strengths and lacunae. We trace several key themes in this corpus, including problem structure, the concern that climate engineering could undermine emissions cuts, the potentially “slippery slope” of research and development, unilateral implementation, interstate conflict, militarization, rising tensions between industrialized and developing countries, and governance challenges and opportunities. The international politics of climate engineering is then considered through the lenses of the leading IR theories (Realism, Institutionalism, Liberalism, and Constructivism), exploring both what they have contributed and possible lines of future inquiry. Disciplinary IR scholars should have much to say on a number of topics related to climate engineering, including its power and transformational potentials, the possibility of counter-climate engineering, issues of institutional design, international law, and emergent practices. We believe that it is incumbent on the IR community, whose defining focus is international relations, to turn its attention to these unprecedented technologies and to the full scope of possible ramifications they might have for the international system.","PeriodicalId":238624,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Governance (Sub-Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"69","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Governance (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ISR/VIV013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

Abstract

Proposed large-scale intentional interventions in natural systems in order to counter climate change, typically called “climate engineering” or “geoengineering,” stand to dramatically alter the international politics of climate change and potentially much more. There is currently a significant and growing literature on the international politics of climate engineering. However, it has been produced primarily by scholars from outside the discipline of International Relations (IR). We are concerned that IR scholars are missing a critical opportunity to offer insights into, and perhaps help shape, the emerging international politics of climate engineering. To that end, the primary goal of this paper is to call the attention of the IR community to these developments. Thus, we offer here an overview of the existing literature on the international politics of climate engineering and a preliminary assessment of its strengths and lacunae. We trace several key themes in this corpus, including problem structure, the concern that climate engineering could undermine emissions cuts, the potentially “slippery slope” of research and development, unilateral implementation, interstate conflict, militarization, rising tensions between industrialized and developing countries, and governance challenges and opportunities. The international politics of climate engineering is then considered through the lenses of the leading IR theories (Realism, Institutionalism, Liberalism, and Constructivism), exploring both what they have contributed and possible lines of future inquiry. Disciplinary IR scholars should have much to say on a number of topics related to climate engineering, including its power and transformational potentials, the possibility of counter-climate engineering, issues of institutional design, international law, and emergent practices. We believe that it is incumbent on the IR community, whose defining focus is international relations, to turn its attention to these unprecedented technologies and to the full scope of possible ramifications they might have for the international system.
气候工程的国际政治:国际关系综述与展望
为了应对气候变化,对自然系统进行大规模有意干预的提议,通常被称为“气候工程”或“地球工程”,将极大地改变气候变化的国际政治,甚至可能带来更多的影响。目前,关于气候工程的国际政治的文献越来越多。然而,它主要是由国际关系(IR)学科以外的学者制作的。我们担心,国际关系学者正在错失一个重要的机会,无法对气候工程的新兴国际政治提供见解,甚至可能帮助塑造这种政治。为此,本文的主要目标是引起IR社区对这些发展的关注。因此,我们在这里概述了关于气候工程国际政治的现有文献,并对其优势和不足进行了初步评估。我们在这个语料库中追踪了几个关键主题,包括问题结构、对气候工程可能破坏减排的担忧、研发的潜在“滑坡”、单边实施、国家间冲突、军事化、工业化国家和发展中国家之间日益紧张的关系,以及治理的挑战和机遇。然后,通过领先的国际关系理论(现实主义、制度主义、自由主义和建构主义)的镜头来考虑气候工程的国际政治,探索它们的贡献和未来调查的可能路线。学科IR学者应该对气候工程相关的许多主题发表很多意见,包括其力量和转型潜力、反气候工程的可能性、制度设计问题、国际法和紧急实践。我们认为,以国际关系为核心的国际关系界有责任将注意力转向这些前所未有的技术,以及它们可能对国际体系产生的全面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信