Phenomenology of Digital Academic Dishonesty at University

Elizaveta Klopkova, A. Miklyaeva
{"title":"Phenomenology of Digital Academic Dishonesty at University","authors":"Elizaveta Klopkova, A. Miklyaeva","doi":"10.21603/2782-4799-2022-1-3-155-160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes the phenomenology of academic dishonesty in offline and online learning. The authors developed a questionnaire to assess the occurrence of various types of cheating, students’ subjective attitude to academic dishonesty, and its context. The study involved 52 university students aged 18–25 (37 female respondents). The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis using the G-criterion and the Fisher’s angular transformation. The content analysis consisted of questions that required an extended answer. In online environment, the most common form of academic dishonesty was cheating at exams and tests by copying a fellow student's digital work, imitating technical problems, googling for answers, and providing false references. Students treated online academic dishonesty as more acceptable than during face-to-face learning. The study proves that the phenomenology of online academic dishonesty is significantly different from its traditional variant and, therefore, requires more detailed research.","PeriodicalId":359429,"journal":{"name":"Virtual Communication and Social Networks","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virtual Communication and Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2022-1-3-155-160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article describes the phenomenology of academic dishonesty in offline and online learning. The authors developed a questionnaire to assess the occurrence of various types of cheating, students’ subjective attitude to academic dishonesty, and its context. The study involved 52 university students aged 18–25 (37 female respondents). The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis using the G-criterion and the Fisher’s angular transformation. The content analysis consisted of questions that required an extended answer. In online environment, the most common form of academic dishonesty was cheating at exams and tests by copying a fellow student's digital work, imitating technical problems, googling for answers, and providing false references. Students treated online academic dishonesty as more acceptable than during face-to-face learning. The study proves that the phenomenology of online academic dishonesty is significantly different from its traditional variant and, therefore, requires more detailed research.
高校数字化学术不诚信现象研究
本文描述了学术不诚信在线下和线上学习中的现象。作者编制了一份调查问卷,以评估各种作弊行为的发生情况、学生对学术不诚实的主观态度及其背景。该研究涉及52名年龄在18-25岁之间的大学生(其中37名是女性)。利用g准则和Fisher角变换对所得数据进行统计分析。内容分析由需要扩展答案的问题组成。在网络环境中,最常见的学术欺诈形式是在考试和测试中作弊,通过抄袭同学的数字作业、模仿技术问题、谷歌搜索答案和提供虚假参考资料。与面对面学习相比,学生们更能接受网络学术欺诈。研究证明,网络学术不诚实的现象学与传统学术不诚实的现象学有明显的不同,因此需要更详细的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信