Insights into the Product Quality and Energy Requirements for Solid Biofuel Production: A Comparison of Hydrothermal Carbonization, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction of Olive Tree Pruning

J. González-Arias, X. Gómez, M. González-Castaño, M. E. Sánchez, J. Rosas, J. Cara-Jiménez
{"title":"Insights into the Product Quality and Energy Requirements for Solid Biofuel Production: A Comparison of Hydrothermal Carbonization, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction of Olive Tree Pruning","authors":"J. González-Arias, X. Gómez, M. González-Castaño, M. E. Sánchez, J. Rosas, J. Cara-Jiménez","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3877172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the energy consumption needs to produce solid biofuels is a key point in the path towards a bio-economy establishment. In this paper, olive tree pruning was treated by both dry (pyrolysis and torrefaction) and wet (hydrothermal carbonization) thermal treatments. Product yield, solid quality and energy consumption were assessed. The solids were characterized by means of chemical and thermogravimetric analysis. For all treatments, coal-like solid products were obtained, with higher heating values of almost 30 MJ/kg in most of the conditions evaluated. Chars obtained from pyrolysis present the greater carbon content (between 76 and 85 wt.%) but also the higher ash content (ranging from 6 to 9 wt.%). The values obtained from torrefaction and HTC are lower, ranging from 60 to 76 wt.% in terms of carbon content. From an energy consumption perspective, torrefaction is suggested to be the most advantageous treatment. The least severe conditions allow to obtain a positive energy balance only with the solid phase considered. Nonetheless, further room for improvement of the processes are at sight as the gas and liquid phases can also be valorised. These results at lab-scale open new avenues for optimization of the thermal treatments proposed at industrial-scale.","PeriodicalId":378433,"journal":{"name":"Materials for Energy eJournal","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials for Energy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3877172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Understanding the energy consumption needs to produce solid biofuels is a key point in the path towards a bio-economy establishment. In this paper, olive tree pruning was treated by both dry (pyrolysis and torrefaction) and wet (hydrothermal carbonization) thermal treatments. Product yield, solid quality and energy consumption were assessed. The solids were characterized by means of chemical and thermogravimetric analysis. For all treatments, coal-like solid products were obtained, with higher heating values of almost 30 MJ/kg in most of the conditions evaluated. Chars obtained from pyrolysis present the greater carbon content (between 76 and 85 wt.%) but also the higher ash content (ranging from 6 to 9 wt.%). The values obtained from torrefaction and HTC are lower, ranging from 60 to 76 wt.% in terms of carbon content. From an energy consumption perspective, torrefaction is suggested to be the most advantageous treatment. The least severe conditions allow to obtain a positive energy balance only with the solid phase considered. Nonetheless, further room for improvement of the processes are at sight as the gas and liquid phases can also be valorised. These results at lab-scale open new avenues for optimization of the thermal treatments proposed at industrial-scale.
固体生物燃料生产的产品质量和能源需求:橄榄树剪枝水热炭化、热解和焙烧的比较
了解生产固体生物燃料所需的能源消耗是建立生物经济的关键。本文采用干法(热解焙烧)和湿法(水热炭化)两种热处理方法对橄榄树剪枝进行处理。对产品收率、固体质量和能耗进行了评价。通过化学和热重分析对固体进行了表征。对于所有处理,都获得了类似煤的固体产物,在大多数评估条件下具有更高的热值,几乎为30 MJ/kg。热解得到的焦炭碳含量较高(在76 - 85 wt.%之间),但灰分含量也较高(在6 - 9 wt.%之间)。碳化和HTC的碳含量较低,在60 - 76 wt.%之间。从能源消耗的角度来看,焙烧是最有利的处理方法。最不恶劣的条件只允许在考虑固相时获得正能量平衡。尽管如此,由于气相和液相也可以稳定,因此该工艺还有进一步改进的空间。这些在实验室规模上的结果为在工业规模上提出的热处理优化开辟了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信