Procedure for exercising the rights of a person wrongfully deprived of liberty or wrongfully convicted

D. Milovanović
{"title":"Procedure for exercising the rights of a person wrongfully deprived of liberty or wrongfully convicted","authors":"D. Milovanović","doi":"10.5937/zrpfn0-33698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Serbia provides special proceedings for exercising the rights of a person wrongfully deprived of liberty or wrongfully convicted (Chapter 25, Articles 583-595 CPC). The introduction of such proceedings in the Serbian criminal legislation is a consequence of an enormous number of acquittals, particularly in cases where the defendant has been subjected to the most serious security measure aimed at ensuring presence of the accused person in criminal procedure. These proceedings appeared to be necessary for the purpose of exercising the wrongfully detained or convicted person's right to compensation for damage. In particular, it refers to situations where the final court decision was reversed and the person was acquitted after lodging an appeal for extraordinary legal remedies. In such circumstances, the procedure includes two interconnected stages: initiating an administrative proceeding and initiating court proceedings. Thus, if the injured party does not exercise the envisaged rights on the basis of the submitted request for initiating the administrative procedure, he/she is entitled to initiate court proceeding before the competent court against the Republic of Serbia as a responsible party. By introducing the possibility of exercising the injured party's rights in administrative proceedings, the legislator's primary goal when prescribing this procedure was to ease the courts' workload in handling collective lawsuits. In that context, the aim of this paper is to describe the process of initiating and conducting both phases of these proceedings, and to point out to some omissions in the work of the Damage Compensation Commission in the course of administrative proceedings, which are detrimental to the injured party and directly contrary to the legislator's intention. For the purpose of precluding future omissions, the author draws attention to the main drawbacks of the entire procedure.","PeriodicalId":192224,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn0-33698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Serbia provides special proceedings for exercising the rights of a person wrongfully deprived of liberty or wrongfully convicted (Chapter 25, Articles 583-595 CPC). The introduction of such proceedings in the Serbian criminal legislation is a consequence of an enormous number of acquittals, particularly in cases where the defendant has been subjected to the most serious security measure aimed at ensuring presence of the accused person in criminal procedure. These proceedings appeared to be necessary for the purpose of exercising the wrongfully detained or convicted person's right to compensation for damage. In particular, it refers to situations where the final court decision was reversed and the person was acquitted after lodging an appeal for extraordinary legal remedies. In such circumstances, the procedure includes two interconnected stages: initiating an administrative proceeding and initiating court proceedings. Thus, if the injured party does not exercise the envisaged rights on the basis of the submitted request for initiating the administrative procedure, he/she is entitled to initiate court proceeding before the competent court against the Republic of Serbia as a responsible party. By introducing the possibility of exercising the injured party's rights in administrative proceedings, the legislator's primary goal when prescribing this procedure was to ease the courts' workload in handling collective lawsuits. In that context, the aim of this paper is to describe the process of initiating and conducting both phases of these proceedings, and to point out to some omissions in the work of the Damage Compensation Commission in the course of administrative proceedings, which are detrimental to the injured party and directly contrary to the legislator's intention. For the purpose of precluding future omissions, the author draws attention to the main drawbacks of the entire procedure.
被错误地剥夺自由或被错误地定罪的人行使权利的程序
《塞尔维亚共和国刑事诉讼法》规定了行使被错误剥夺自由或被错误定罪的人的权利的特别程序(《中华人民共和国宪法》第25章第583-595条)。在塞尔维亚刑事立法中采用这种诉讼程序是由于大量无罪释放的结果,特别是在被告受到最严重的安全措施的情况下,目的是确保被告出席刑事诉讼程序。为了行使被错误拘留或被定罪的人要求赔偿损害的权利,这些诉讼程序似乎是必要的。特别是,它指的是法院推翻了终审判决,当事人在提出特别法律救济上诉后被宣告无罪的情况。在这种情况下,程序包括两个相互关联的阶段:启动行政程序和启动法院程序。因此,如果受害方没有根据提出的启动行政程序的请求行使设想的权利,他/她有权在主管法院对作为责任方的塞尔维亚共和国提起诉讼。通过引入在行政诉讼中行使受害方权利的可能性,立法者规定这一程序的主要目的是减轻法院处理集体诉讼的工作量。在这种情况下,本文的目的是描述启动和实施这些诉讼的两个阶段的过程,并指出损害赔偿委员会在行政诉讼过程中工作中的一些疏漏,这些疏漏对受害方有害,并直接违反立法者的意图。为了避免今后的遗漏,作者提请注意整个程序的主要缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信