‘Human First’: Teaching close reading and creative writing to medical students

Sif Stewart-Ferrer, A. Rasmussen
{"title":"‘Human First’: Teaching close reading and creative writing to medical students","authors":"Sif Stewart-Ferrer, A. Rasmussen","doi":"10.7146/tfss.v16i31.116961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The University of Southern Denmark has introduced a mandatory course in Narrative Medicine into the curriculum of undergraduate medical students. It is part of a trajectory called ‘Human First’, which aims to improve the students’ empathic abilities by teaching them narrative competencies to draw on in their future clinical encounters as medical doctors. Although, theoretical accounts seem to make a strong case for the utility and value of educational interventions, such as courses in narrative medicine or medical humanities, there has been a lack of empirical studies providing evidence to support such accounts – especially those focusing on the long-term effects and impact on patient care. Our systematic literature search and review of empirical studies regarding the effects of teaching close reading of fictional texts and creative writing to medical and health care students, tentatively confirmed previous indications of positive effects. Larger, multi-site and more rigorous studies that assess the long-term impacts of these educational interventions and adjust for local variations are, however, still in short supply. Finally, we present critical reflections on whether empathy and similar phenomena are at all measurable and discuss the possibility of meaningfully evaluating the utility of curricular interventions such as narrative medicine courses.","PeriodicalId":110718,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v16i31.116961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The University of Southern Denmark has introduced a mandatory course in Narrative Medicine into the curriculum of undergraduate medical students. It is part of a trajectory called ‘Human First’, which aims to improve the students’ empathic abilities by teaching them narrative competencies to draw on in their future clinical encounters as medical doctors. Although, theoretical accounts seem to make a strong case for the utility and value of educational interventions, such as courses in narrative medicine or medical humanities, there has been a lack of empirical studies providing evidence to support such accounts – especially those focusing on the long-term effects and impact on patient care. Our systematic literature search and review of empirical studies regarding the effects of teaching close reading of fictional texts and creative writing to medical and health care students, tentatively confirmed previous indications of positive effects. Larger, multi-site and more rigorous studies that assess the long-term impacts of these educational interventions and adjust for local variations are, however, still in short supply. Finally, we present critical reflections on whether empathy and similar phenomena are at all measurable and discuss the possibility of meaningfully evaluating the utility of curricular interventions such as narrative medicine courses.
“以人为本”:教授医学生细读和创意写作
南丹麦大学在医科本科学生的课程中开设了叙事医学的必修课。这是“以人为本”计划的一部分,该计划旨在通过教授学生叙事能力来提高他们的移情能力,以便在未来作为医生的临床遭遇中有所借鉴。虽然,理论解释似乎有力地证明了教育干预的效用和价值,比如叙事医学或医学人文学科的课程,但缺乏实证研究提供证据来支持这些解释——尤其是那些关注长期影响和对病人护理影响的研究。我们系统的文献检索和回顾了关于对医学和卫生保健学生进行小说文本细读和创意写作教学的效果的实证研究,初步证实了之前的积极效果。然而,评估这些教育干预措施的长期影响并根据地方差异进行调整的更大规模、多地点和更严格的研究仍然缺乏。最后,我们对共情和类似现象是否可测量提出了批判性反思,并讨论了有意义地评估课程干预措施(如叙事医学课程)效用的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信